Skinner, Kane, Eriksson

[rataylor22]

Thinking of offering Skinner for either P. Kane or Eriksson. Which of the three would you rather have?

[metaldude26]

Patrick Kane would be my #1 and it's not close. I know he's coming off a down year but so is Skinner so best of luck swinging this deal.

[lucifer316]

i would be shoring up that goaltending before worrying about another foward to be honest with you

[rataylor22]

Lol. Lucifer we've discussed this before. I'm not worried about Luongo, my goaltending is fine.

[JHM]

I have all three.

For this year.
Upside
1) Kane 53
2) Skinner 46
3) Erickson 45

Downside
1) Erickson 40
2) Kane 38
3) Skinner 32
(something like that)

Long term. Ahhhh. They're all young enough that it's not an issue. They all have solid five year windows.

Kane has given off signs of emotional stress. Small.
Skinner coming off a season of less than we hoped for.
Erickson incredibly consistent, even when we think other factors can impede.

Hall of Fame Probability
1) Kane 50%
2) Skinner 25%
3) Erickson 10%

Youth factor (find another level)
1) Skinner
2) Kane
3) Erickson (unlikely to find it)


G(3)
1) Skinner (30 upside - shooter)
2) Kane 20 upside (more playmaker)
3) Erickson 18 upside

A(2)
1) Kane 38 upside
2) Erickson 30 upside
3) Skinner 25 upside

+/-
1) Kane (Chicago) +15
2) Erickson (Dallas)
2) Skinner (Carolina)

PIM(0.5)
1) Skinner 40 upside
2) Kane 25 upside
3) Erickson 6 upside

PPP(2)
All good options capable of 15 PPP

SHP(3)
I'm not up on this one. Upside is about 2 points for any one of them.

GWG(2)
Advantage to goal scorers.

HITS(0.1)
I don't think this is necessarily a strength for any of them.

BLKS(0.2)
Same deal here as hits. Do your research.

[One87]

Thinking of offering Skinner for either P. Kane or Eriksson. Which of the three would you rather have?

P. Kane, for sure. Loui may outpoint Skinner by 5 - 10pts, so their production is almost a wash, imo.