Who gets the better deal?

[Colwood]

Who gets the better deal -

Ovechkin and Neal for Benn, Horton, B. Richards and Yukapov (prospect)

Not just for this year but the future as well.

Thanks

[lucifer316]

even with worries i have about ovechkin that side by a lot for me

[Colwood]

G & A only

[cb4]

Benn and Neal are close to a wash IMO. I like the Ovechkin side here.

[rataylor22]

Depends on your team. If you have terrible depth then selling I Ovechkin for Horton, Richards, and Yakupov is a decent return (counting Neal and Benn as a wash). If you have depth, you're still giving up the best player in the deal

[lucifer316]

G & A only

g & a only

[Essej]

I'd be very happy to get Ovechkin at that price.

[lucifer316]

Depends on your team. If you have terrible depth then selling I Ovechkin for Horton, Richards, and Yakupov is a decent return (counting Neal and Benn as a wash). If you have depth, you're still giving up the best player in the deal

im sorry but horton richards and yakupov isnt half a deal for ovechkin

[Colwood]

Ya I have some depth but not incredable, I may take ovie off the table and try for a Neal for Benn and Yukapov deal. I only have a year left on Neal

[Colwood]

sorry, my Sig is not up to date

[rataylor22]

im sorry but horton richards and yakupov isnt half a deal for ovechkin

Lucifer based on other posts I just think we'll have to agree that we think differently in fantasy hockey. In points only if Horton puts up 65, Richards (I'm assuming Brad) puts up 70, and Yakupov puts up 50 with the potential for PPG in a few years (all pro-rated obviously), then in points only yea that's a good return if his team doesn't have a lot of depth. See the conversation in the link below for the theory behind it.

http://forums.dobbersports.com/showt...26#post1052026

[arctic_rogue]

I'd go with Ovechkin and Neal at this point in time. May be very different in two years time, but right now it's that side by quite a margin.

[lucifer316]

Lucifer based on other posts I just think we'll have to agree that we think differently in fantasy hockey. In points only if Horton puts up 65, Richards (I'm assuming Brad) puts up 70, and Yakupov puts up 50 with the potential for PPG in a few years (all pro-rated obviously), then in points only yea that's a good return if his team doesn't have a lot of depth. See the conversation in the link below for the theory behind it.

http://forums.dobbersports.com/showt...26#post1052026

its been nearly half a decade since horton sniffed 65

richards might put up 70 or he might decline yet again

yakupov is no guarantee for anything

a has been a never was and an unknown for one of the best players in this generation isnt even close im sorry these players are stiffs other than yakupov but he is a complete unknown

[MarmotKing]

I like the ovy and neal side and I believe they're the best players of this entire deal.

[rataylor22]

its been nearly half a decade since horton sniffed 65

richards might put up 70 or he might decline yet again

yakupov is no guarantee for anything

a has been a never was and an unknown for one of the best players in this generation isnt even close im sorry these players are stiffs other than yakupov but he is a complete unknown

Because Ovechkins 67 points from last year is definitely otherworldly right? 67 is really good right? Right? Darn. It's pretty average actually.