Greiss vs. Bishop

[TheWherewithal]

Hi all,
I'm wondering about the difference in upside and opportunity you foresee between Thomas Greiss and Ben Bishop. I suppose they are both somewhat similar, but if you had to choose one (for a dynasty league), which would it be? They both have other goalies that may be competing with them for the backup jobs (Stalock, Lehner). I suppose Greiss has a higher probability of being traded, although Bishop may have more opportunity to play in Ottawa, given Anderson's injury record. Categories are w, s/o, s% and gaa. I'm looking for an eventual starter rather than a backup with good numbers.
Thanks.
Jg.

[bondon]

I would probably go with Greiss...but can't really justify why.

Goalie situations can change in a heartbeat...but Lehner is just better than Stalock and to me poses more of a threat to Bishop...Niemi is kind of bad sometimes too.

Lol, that's honestly the best I can do. Hard to gauge wait times on goalies sometimes because like I said, situations can change.

[dyzfunctioned]

Greiss gets my vote - better situation.

[Carcillo]

I like Bishop's upside more. He faces tougher competition in Lehner but I'd still go with him.

[TheWherewithal]

Thanks. Still on the fence, but my gut tells me Greiss.

[Hullofafan]

In a dynasty league Greiss in the better position.

[Shoeless]

I am much like b0ndon - hard to justify recommending Greiss, but I think the Lehner factor in the Sens organization is enough to tip me in his favor. Honestly don't think either will become full time starters in the NHL without some kind of injury to the guys they are backing up.