Halak or Hiller? (rest of the year)

[szuturon]

One year pool. W, L, GA, GAA, SV, SV%, SHO

I have Halak and I'm wondering with these stats, if this is an offer I should be making and if you were a Hiller owner, would you take this?

[93213]

I don't think I would bother. With Hitchcock at the helm I would rather take my chances on Halak if I were you. That said, I'm a Hiller owner, but wouldn't make that trade straight up.
Too close and too much potential too look like an ass.

[bondon]

I think Halak will have a better W/L ratio, will have fewer goals scored and as such a lower GAA, but Hiller will have more SV and I would throw SV% up as a wash for now with a slight edge to Hiller. SO, while a crapshoot, I'd still have to give to Halak seeing as his team system is better than the one in front of Hiller.

I dunno I personally also threw out an offer including my Halak for his Hiller as a package for a buy-low attempt but even now I'm wondering. I'm kind of in the same boat as 93213 that if I were a Hiller owner I'd be more inclined to stick it out with him, but being a Halak owner I don't think I'd be willing to take on Hiller right now either.

Kind of one of those risk-tolerance cases. Each side would be more content with the side they've already got I think.

Hope some of this post made a bit of sense lol.

[blayze]

I would still keep Hiller over Halak.

I feel like the second you trade Hiller, the Ducks will finally wake up from their hibernation and explode (which is what they usually do each year).

Besides Elliott is still playing too well in STL to make me feel comfortable.