Canadian Election

[rataylor22]

“Educating”

[PenguinHunter]

That's all code for the RCMP knowing they won't find much, rightly or wrongly

Or is it code that someone of authority told them not to pursue it or they would end up without a job like someone else?

[lobo1969]

Or is it code that someone of authority told them not to pursue it or they would end up without a job like someone else?

Sure, if you want to go down a conspiracy rabbit hole and assume that everyone with the RCMP can be bought or threatened not to do their jobs.

[doulos]

“Educating”

"mustard"

[Hooker]

There's no conspiracy. Trudeau has simply declined to waive cabinet privilege. Without that, RCMP will have no evidence of an actual crime being committed. No one will ever know what was said past the (~January 6th?) date that he allowed JWR to speak. I find it difficult to believe that anyone that read the (Trudeau II) report would vote for him, red coloured glasses folk notwithstanding.

[Wonko]

There's no conspiracy. Trudeau has simply declined to waive cabinet privilege. Without that, RCMP will have no evidence of an actual crime being committed. No one will ever know what was said past the (~January 6th?) date that he allowed JWR to speak. I find it difficult to believe that anyone that read the (Trudeau II) report would vote for him, red coloured glasses folk notwithstanding.

This could be one reason -trudeau-has-canada-s-economy-humming

Plus it is expensive to switch governments. So for economic reasons alone Canada should likely stay the course.

[2014olympicgold]

I found this:
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/2019-fed...-far-1.1308714

I don't know how accurate it is, but it does a strong job for saying what each party is standing for.

[ACC90]

There's no conspiracy. Trudeau has simply declined to waive cabinet privilege. Without that, RCMP will have no evidence of an actual crime being committed. No one will ever know what was said past the (~January 6th?) date that he allowed JWR to speak. I find it difficult to believe that anyone that read the (Trudeau II) report would vote for him, red coloured glasses folk notwithstanding.

THIS, the fact that the cabinet doesn't waive their privilege is a big issue in this story.
If you have nothing to hide and have confidence in the law, you don't do this..

Other "strange" story :
May 2019 : Liberal Party pays Obama 400k USD for a single speech in Ottawa
October 2019 : Obama is endorsing Trudeau in the election

[doulos]

I found this:
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/2019-fed...-far-1.1308714

I don't know how accurate it is, but it does a strong job for saying what each party is standing for.

It's a good resource. I used something similar when making my decision as well. I was a little surprised when I dug deeper, at some of the things the parties were planning. (for all the good any "plans" by parties are)

[Canucks_fan18]

There's no conspiracy. Trudeau has simply declined to waive cabinet privilege. Without that, RCMP will have no evidence of an actual crime being committed. No one will ever know what was said past the (~January 6th?) date that he allowed JWR to speak. I find it difficult to believe that anyone that read the (Trudeau II) report would vote for him, red coloured glasses folk notwithstanding.

I agree with this Trudeau is not a good leader. He lack(ed) the experience when he was first voted in and was only leading the party due to his looks and last name. Can people really sit there and say that Trudeau would of been prime minister if his last name was let's say Smith? No way. He wouldn't even be running. I could care less about the black face ordeal, I honestly think their was no malicious intent and it happened during a time where the lines of what was right and wrong were a little more grey. But their is no excusing the SNC incident and the fall out with even his own cabinet members. If that was a conservative scandal the peaceful left would be at Scheers house protesting and harassing his family.

[Dennis]

Genuinely curious,

Does anyone believe Scheer would've handled the SNC Lavalin case any differently other than never appointing an MP to a cabinet position who would dare say no to him in the first place?

[Wonko]

Genuinely curious,

Does anyone believe Scheer would've handled the SNC Lavalin case any differently other than never appointing an MP to a cabinet position who would dare say no to him in the first place?

Exactly. If you think otherwise you are the one wearing the rose coloured glasses.

[Canucks_fan18]

Genuinely curious,

Does anyone believe Scheer would've handled the SNC Lavalin case any differently other than never appointing an MP to a cabinet position who would dare say no to him in the first place?

Well considering this is Trudeau backing a Quebec company, I don't think Scheer would of been in this position in the first place. Just another case of Quebec protecting their own.

[Dennis]

Well considering this is Trudeau backing a Quebec company, I don't think Scheer would of been in this position in the first place. Just another case of Quebec protecting their own.

A deflection worthy of a career politician. Only about 3,400 of nearly 9,000 employees are Quebecois.

I sincerely ask, if Andrew Scheer were Prime Minister do you believe he would've handled the file any differently?

[Auston'sWilly]

Well considering this is Trudeau backing a Quebec company, I don't think Scheer would of been in this position in the first place. Just another case of Quebec protecting their own.

Exactly.

It is so hilariously telling that the only way the left can defend Trudeau for SNC is by deflecting with hypothetical questions like "would Scheer have handled it any differently?" LOL
So now conservatives are the ones with rose coloured glasses because we're looking at something that never even happened. #LeftLogic