Reply With QuoteI'd drop Johnson -- barring some serious problems in Pitts, Fleury will be the go to guy there. With PHI it can still go either way.
Johnson or Leighton?
I currently have Kipper, Johnson, MAF, and Leighton on the IR. Once Leighton comes back I need to drop one due to a three goalie limit.
Do I keep Johnson or Leighton?
I've been leaning toward Leighton but I am not sure (Bobrovsky is long gone so I can't grab him as insurance).
Team:
Eichel, Panarin, Tavares,
Werenski
Markstrom
Stats:
G,A,+-,PPG,PPA,SHG.SHA,SOG,PIM,GA,W,SV,SO,SHOW,SHOL
I'd drop Johnson -- barring some serious problems in Pitts, Fleury will be the go to guy there. With PHI it can still go either way.
__________________
16 team, 1 yr. Roto
G, A, PPP , HITS, SOGS, BLKS | WINS, GAA, SAVE%, SO
start 1C, 1L, 1R, 2D, 1G | 3BN, 1IR
C: Thorton
LW: Hall
RW: MSL
D: Phaneuf, Seabrook
G: Niemi
BN: Lucic, Markov, Harding
**************
That is probably a sound move. I drafted Leighton so I want to get something out of that draft pick. Philly is also a good team so to drop him could be a double whammy - losing his fantasy points and potentially watching them help another team.
Team:
Eichel, Panarin, Tavares,
Werenski
Markstrom
Stats:
G,A,+-,PPG,PPA,SHG.SHA,SOG,PIM,GA,W,SV,SO,SHOW,SHOL
Yeah MAF will pick it up as the year goes on and Johnson will see more of the bench so you minus will stick with Leighton as a chance. I still think that he only splits for awhile before hitting the bench full time.
Yep, I did drop Johnson and I am glad I traded Chris Mason & Ondrej Pavalec for MAF. He has sure helped my goalie situation!
Team:
Eichel, Panarin, Tavares,
Werenski
Markstrom
Stats:
G,A,+-,PPG,PPA,SHG.SHA,SOG,PIM,GA,W,SV,SO,SHOW,SHOL
Posting Permissions