Positional requirements??
I was offered my Patrick Kane for his Ryan Getzlaf.
In just pure points and pp play points..........who is better to have?
Should I do this deal?
Help!!
Thanks.
F: Malkin, Stamkos, Ovechkin, N.Backstrom, P.Kane, Toews, Perry
D: Doughty, Yandle, Suter
G: Miller, Luongo, Schneider
Farm Team: Yakupov(F), Tatar(F), B.Smith(D), R.Murphy(D)
Positional requirements??
Someone in my league just last year made that trade - but we have positional requirements and faceoffs in play.
Frankly I would rather have Getzlaf because of his multi-cat ability. But if your league is just points etc then it may be a wash.
16 team H2H keeper league - 4C, 4LW, 4RW, 6D, 2G, 3UTIL, 5 BENCH
Skaters: G/A/+-/PIM/PPP/SOG/FOW/SHP/Hits
Goalies: W/Saves/SV%/GAA/SO
I'd take Kane regardless of positions here. He seems, at this point to be a little moe durabe than Getz and, although Getz and the Ducks whole 1st PP unit will produce very well, CHI will score more in all situations.
Alot of Getz's luster is not as bright next to Kane's if PIM's is out of the eqution, in my opinion.
My choice is Kane , I traded for him last season because I feel he's the real deal and will only grow in the pts. department.
Roto type keeper league.We keep any 6 ;15 teams , 3 div. of 5.We play 3 lines , 3 def. and start 2 goalies.6 BN.Stats are 1pt. for goals and assists , 2pts. for W , tie(O.T. or S.O. loss) 1pt. S.O. 1pt.Weekly line-up from Mon. to Sun. Total pts. per line against other teams lines.
LW - Ovechkin , Drouin ,Steen , Huberdeau
RW - Nash , Callahan , Nyquist
C - B. Schenn , Fisher , R.N.H. , St. Louis , T. Johnson
Def.- E. Johnson , Gologoski , Suter , Doughty , O.E.L.
G - Scheinder , Dubnyk , Lack
If Getz is already losing his hair, what else is he going to lose when he's 30??
Take Kane.
Sneeze Girl: retired (Brett Favre'd)
______________________________________
9 Keeper, 7 Teams:
1 G, 1 A, 1 PPA, 1 PPG, 2 GWG, 1 SHG, +/-
3 WIN, -1 LOST, 5 SHUTOUT, -0.5 GA, 0.3 SV, -0.2 SHOT
Lumping all forwards, no PIMs....keep Kane. Lot's o'points for a loooong time comin'.
@SmittysRant
Keep Kane unless the other guy sweetens the deal. Not enough separation in points to bother otherwise.
Yep there in no point tradnig Kane here , he is younger with the same upside if not higher in a pts only no positions