Dynasty League Player Salaries!

[NordiqueFan]

maybe fix the minimum salary at a range between 15-20$ so il will represent better average versus real salary...

[Chinny]

\"MID SEASON\" Salaries coming soon!

I expect to release updated salary projections monday or tuesday of next week!

[Chinny]

\"Mid Season\" salary projections, enjoy!

[file name=Salaries_mid.zip size=45892]http://www.dobberhockey.com/images/fbfiles/files/Salaries_mid.zip[/file]

[Chicleteur]

With less than 20 games to play, would it be too much to ask for one last update before the season is over?

Thanks in advance buddy!

[Chinny]

why dont you just ask for the world next!

yeah i should be able to get to it in the next few days if not tomr

[Chicleteur]

Chinny wrote:

why dont you just ask for the world next!

yeah i should be able to get to it in the next few days if not tomr

Hey you know me and you should know that I did mean to put you any pressure...

I just thought that it could be a good thing to have at this stage.

Take your time many thanks!

[Chinny]

you know that i have said it takes me under 5 mins to do, it isn\'t a problem at all

[mapletreemarty]

Just looking at the salaries this morning. Isn\'t it a little weird that high performance players that should have a large cap hit benefit from getting injured by lowering their cap hit?? While essentially durable players are handicapped with high cap hits because they play 82 games?? I know that these are performance based but someone like Brodeur should not have a lower cap hit than Martin Biron.

[Chicleteur]

Any update on the salaries Chinny?

[Chicleteur]

mapletreemarty wrote:

Just looking at the salaries this morning. Isn\'t it a little weird that high performance players that should have a large cap hit benefit from getting injured by lowering their cap hit?? While essentially durable players are handicapped with high cap hits because they play 82 games?? I know that these are performance based but someone like Brodeur should not have a lower cap hit than Martin Biron.

You have a pretty good point here Maple. However, since our cap is based on the contribution of the player, I\'m not sure we can do anything about it. However, I think Russ\'s suggestion to give less credit to the last year in order to give more credits to the past year should help this.

If I recall properly (correct me if I\'m wrong Chinny or Russ), I think right now it\'s 60/30/10 and Russ would like to see it 50/35/15.

While talking about salaries Russ, did I dream or you also mentioned that you might change the cap next year, depending on the final salaries. I remember you talking about the fact that it didn\'t make sense to keep a 1K cap if most teams are over it.

[ultrawhiteness]

Chicleteur wrote:

mapletreemarty wrote:

Just looking at the salaries this morning. Isn\'t it a little weird that high performance players that should have a large cap hit benefit from getting injured by lowering their cap hit?? While essentially durable players are handicapped with high cap hits because they play 82 games?? I know that these are performance based but someone like Brodeur should not have a lower cap hit than Martin Biron.

You have a pretty good point here Maple. However, since our cap is based on the contribution of the player, I\'m not sure we can do anything about it. However, I think Russ\'s suggestion to give less credit to the last year in order to give more credits to the past year should help this.

If I recall properly (correct me if I\'m wrong Chinny or Russ), I think right now it\'s 60/30/10 and Russ would like to see it 50/35/15.

While talking about salaries Russ, did I dream or you also mentioned that you might change the cap next year, depending on the final salaries. I remember you talking about the fact that it didn\'t make sense to keep a 1K cap if most teams are over it.

i don\'t mind the way it is now, as it kinda balances out the pain from having the player get hurt and not help your team out.

chic: majority of the teams are over 1K? in Russ\'s last excel update, i only see two teams over 1K, with only 5 other teams within $50 of the cap.

average team salary is $868.

frankly, i don\'t see why we need the extra $250 added to the cap in january... and i could probably even make the argument that $1000 is too high.

[Chicleteur]

ultrawhiteness wrote:

Chicleteur wrote:

mapletreemarty wrote:

Just looking at the salaries this morning. Isn\'t it a little weird that high performance players that should have a large cap hit benefit from getting injured by lowering their cap hit?? While essentially durable players are handicapped with high cap hits because they play 82 games?? I know that these are performance based but someone like Brodeur should not have a lower cap hit than Martin Biron.

You have a pretty good point here Maple. However, since our cap is based on the contribution of the player, I\'m not sure we can do anything about it. However, I think Russ\'s suggestion to give less credit to the last year in order to give more credits to the past year should help this.

If I recall properly (correct me if I\'m wrong Chinny or Russ), I think right now it\'s 60/30/10 and Russ would like to see it 50/35/15.

While talking about salaries Russ, did I dream or you also mentioned that you might change the cap next year, depending on the final salaries. I remember you talking about the fact that it didn\'t make sense to keep a 1K cap if most teams are over it.

i don\'t mind the way it is now, as it kinda balances out the pain from having the player get hurt and not help your team out.

chic: majority of the teams are over 1K? in Russ\'s last excel update, i only see two teams over 1K, with only 5 other teams within $50 of the cap.

average team salary is $868.

frankly, i don\'t see why we need the extra $250 added to the cap in january... and i could probably even make the argument that $1000 is too high.

I\'m not referring to the excel spread sheet Russ sent us once in a while. I\'m talking about a few posts on page 3 of this thread. According to Pensfan, 23 teams are over the cap and Comish tend to agree with the fact that we will probably need to do something.

I guess we\'ll have to look at this seriously at the end of the season.

[Chinny]

Sorry for the delay and i would like everyone to notice that i found an error in how i have been sorting the players which was causing higher salaries, i have attached my teams projected salary as well as this years salary and you will notice they are very similar, if it wasn\'t for me loading up for a playoff run i could of kept under the cap.

Also this is still using a 60/30/10 split

enjoy

[file name=salaries34.zip size=49831]http://www.dobberhockey.com/images/fbfiles/files/salaries34.zip[/file]

[Chinny]

i hope this helps with the questions you guys have been having, the way i have the salaries work out is that i only apply a salary to the top 500 or so players, my issue was that i was sorting that based on this years stats instead of the 3 year stats which was changing the salaried palyers (players over $5, which should be around 500-520) up to 620, which was greatly adding to teams projected salary, just something i didn\'t realize with this being the first year i have attempted to do the projected salaries. I once again don\'t expect the cap to be a huge issue next year, except for teams like me that have made a run for the title and have added some cap in the process

[Chicleteur]

Thanks buddy!