I like offer #2 better. But i wouldn't pull the trigger on either personally.
I got offered Laine for my Scheifele in these 2 alternatives, in our 1-year league:
Offer #1:
He offers: Laine
He wants: Scheifele and Pionk
Alternative offer #2:
He offers: Laine and Palat
He wants: Scheifele, Pionk and Spurgeon
Other GM is 6:6 this week and wants to win. Scheifele, Pionk and Spurgeon are all playing today.
I will sacrifice my week: 5:5 currently.
Note: Pionk have a small injury, he skips practice today. He skipped it also Friday. So maybe it is a good spot to sell him.
Note: Palat is almost not producing these days/weeks. But he is UFA, he should produce. Will he rebound?
With this 2for1 or 3for2 trade I make a roster space for streams and solve the 3 centers overlapping problem (even it is not a huge problem, more on in this thread). Also I could keep Hall today and move Zuccarello from IR+ .
Laine is hot these days, will he sustain? He is UFA.
I see this trade as Scheifele vs Laine, are they close?
My current roster
C - Crosby, Scheifele, Eichel
LW - Hall
RW - Zuccarello, E.Lindholm (+C)
LW,RW Rust, Ehlers
D - Hedman, Krug, D.Toews, Spurgeon, Andersson, Pionk
G - Hellebuyck, Oettinger, Husso
IR - DeAngelo
IR+ Zuccarello (but he should be back today)
League: H2H, 1 year, 12 teams, no keepers, 5 FA pick-ups / week, unlimited trades.
Categories: G, A, P, +/-, PIM, PPP, SOG, Hits, Blocks, Wins, SV%, SHO
Positions: 2xC, 2xLW, 2xRW, 4xD, 2xG, 4xBN, IR, IR+
Drop Batherson or other skater to stream into playoffs?
I like offer #2 better. But i wouldn't pull the trigger on either personally.
no to both