Would you trade Boldy for Jarvis?

[Bonclasskabumami]

I've got Kaprizov on my team and Boldy but I don't have any Canes, which I want a piece of because of their rising trajectory and exposure to Aho and the others. Jarvis has performed well so far this season despite moving up and down the line-up. Boldy has shown well too but fewer games of experience but is likely blocked by Kaprizov on the LW anyhow.

[Bonclasskabumami]

I've got Kaprizov on my team and Boldy but I don't have any Canes, which I want a piece of because of their rising trajectory and exposure to Aho and the others. Jarvis has performed well so far this season despite moving up and down the line-up. Boldy has shown well too but fewer games of experience but is likely blocked by Kaprizov on the LW anyhow.

- - - Updated - - -

Ah, I double posted...how do I remove the duplicate post...?

[Axeman33]

I'd say it's a lateral move. I'm never afraid to own multiple players from any team but if it bugs you, go for it.

[senryu]

Generally, I'd guess that Boldy would be more likely to get hits than Jarvis. But yeah, they're roughly the same value. I'd stick with Boldy.

[als_revenge]

Agree with consensus that this is a lateral move and comes down to personal preference. Jarvis has C/W in Fantrax if that has any value to your league.

[Eskimo Brother]

I would rather own Boldy than Jarvis, so unless you're getting a good sweetener, I would hold off.

[RizzeeDizzee]

To me, the path to success is easier - and earlier - to envision with Boldy.

[Palefa]

I would have said Jarvis personally.

He is off to a good start but Boldy has much less games under his belt. But I am more used to rate players on pts only basis. Just by curiosity, many here seem to prefer (or rate equally) Boldy. Is it because of the league setting?