I love people who doe their own research and read a study summary then tell others what it says but do so completely incorrectly.
While you are trying to tell us that the study says that people who had Covid are more protected than those that had the vaccine, that is not at all what this paper says. This paper says that people who had Covid AND who were vaccinated were more protected than people who had Covid with no vaccines, or those who had vaccines but did not have Covid or those who had neither Covid nor vaccines.
The paper also explicitly states the following: Although the epidemiology of COVID-19 might change with the emergence of new variants, vaccination remains the safest strategy to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections and associated complications; all eligible persons should be up to date with COVID-19 vaccination.
Nothing beats someone posting a study to prove their point but actually scoring for their other team!
Wow. You clearly understand nothing about cancer or how research works. Do you want to go contact the tens of thousands of independent scientists working for universities, colleges, hospitals, non-profits, and governments working on treatments for cancer? Or are they all in on this too?
(Not to mention the crazy financial incentive a pharmaceutical company would have to actually develop a cure for cancer via pill, but hey...)
Every comment you have continues to show you actually have no understanding how the world functions, including science. If you did, you would understand it is impossible to believe any of these conspiracy theories.
To fuel the fire.....I'll add
Repeat business is the best business.
i don't want this thread to turn into a cancer thread because I asked a simple question. But you believing in Big Pharma, just like the other suspects I referred to, explains why we can't come on the same page regarding the pandemic.
But no sweat. We can't find a cure for cancer after MULTI BILLION DOLLARS donated since the 70's, but we have a vaccin (some say cure) for covid within a year while it being "super deadly".
I was born at night, but not last night. Common sense is what you all need, not more boosters.
Ya this is false... (regarding crazy financial incentive for a cure)
As Mr. Guru said "Repeat business is the best business"
Some cancer's have already been dealt with by a pill (not even talking about chemo pills), but it's not a cure. Eventually more potent pills need to be created as the cancer becomes resistant to the current pill. As long as a new more potent pill has to be introduced (buying time for each new pill to be developed) the person will live fine. And the drug companies benefit largely off these repeat customers.
Also messes with statistics as now current cancer patients per capita will be inflated.
Interested in being a Dobber Hockey champion?
Join Our Tiered League Now!
Climb your way to the top of a three tiered Roto league.
Check out the link below for more info or PM me!
https://forums.dobbersports.com/show...League-2023-24
Interested in being a Dobber Hockey champion?
Join Our Tiered League Now!
Climb your way to the top of a three tiered Roto league.
Check out the link below for more info or PM me!
https://forums.dobbersports.com/show...League-2023-24
oh boy, you and your fellow believers would look awfully silly if Trudeau said we need to put fingers up our ass to fight covid. because you guys would be first in the streets parading around doing it.
wow, people truly have lost their ability to think for themselves it appears.
I actually feel sorry for you guys
Thanks pal, good luck to you. Hopefully you can outlive the boosters. If you're MIA from the forums I'll assume the worst. Godspeed.
You see, this is where you lose me. I get skepticism for politicians and big pharma; no question they both have bad track records of greed and dishonesty and biased agendas. But suggesting there is a cure for cancer and the reason it hasn't been revealed is because we are customers, not patients, is really taking it to the next level. That is a pretty extreme view and I would hope that even you can appreciate the level of extreme that is involved with that thought process.
Now, thinking that way is fine; I personally find it a little too extreme to be believable, but that's OK. The issue I take with you, isn't that you have extreme views. It's that you come across with this in-your-face, I am right and anybody who disagrees with me is an idiot type of mentality. You present yourself like your views are the only possibilities, and insult and belittle everyone who disagrees by suggesting they are blind or sheep.
Me personally, I enjoy respectful debate. I have no problem disagreeing with somebody and going our separate ways. I think you might be taken more seriously if you had a tendency to be more respectful with those who disagree with you. I also get the idea that you are very well aware of this, and choose not to be respectful intentionally. Maybe I am wrong.
Rylant