No. Petersen is a lot more of a threat than Lankinen, etc are. Also, Fleury could end up on a better team, while Quick is very unlikely to be dealt.
For team in signature, Quick just became available, would you take him over MAF?
Thanks!
1 Year League, 8 Teams, Weekly lockout, H2H, Unlimited acquisitions, Categories: G, A, SOG, +/-, PIM, HITS, BLK, WINS, SV, SO, GAA, SV%
12F/6D/2G 6 BENCH, 3 IR.
F: B.Tkachuk, Stutzle, JT Miller, Eriksson Ek, Ovechkin, Svechnikov, Aho, Trocheck, Marchand, E. Kane, Wilson, Coleman, Nichushkin, Kadri, Rackell, Rust, Pinto
D: Dahlin, Seider, Bouchard, Weegar, Dobson, Parayko
G:Bobrovsky, Gustavsson, Vasilevskiy
IR , D. Joshua, Trouba
No. Petersen is a lot more of a threat than Lankinen, etc are. Also, Fleury could end up on a better team, while Quick is very unlikely to be dealt.
Want a Signature? Go to Settings, and you'll find Edit Signature down the list on the left.
I’m sticking with Fleury here for the fact that he very well could be traded to a better situation.
Easy no for me, Fleury has way more potential/exposure for the balance of the year.
What was your thought process on this one, wanting to see if I'm missing something.
12 team H2H Fantasy Points:
P=4 PIM=0.1 PPP=1 SHP=3 GWG=1.5 SOG=0.25 HIT=0.1 BLK=0.2
GS=1 W=5 L=-3 GA=-1 SV=.2 & SO=10
F: M Tkachuk, Kucherov, Pettersson, Fiala, Reinhart, Konecny, Terry, Ehlers
D: Werenski, Andersson, Weegar
G: Shesterkin, Hill, Gustavsson
IR: Kane, Svechnikov
Keep 4 bolded (based on last season keepers)
I like Fleury here.