Ekblad + vs Lundkvist and Norris?

[Palefa]

Hi,

I have been offered Ekblad ans either Puljujarvi or Tatar vs my Lundkvist and Norris.

Actual best player is Ekblad so that seems a win. But vs two great potentials...

You do it?

[ross10019]

Ok for starters, excellent and intriguing question, and I'm assuming it's the league in your signature. But it is virtually impossible to give good advice without knowing your roster, your team needs (aging? young?), and your competitive position (win now? rebuilding?).

On the face of it, I'd probably do the deal for Ekblad/Puljujarvi, only because Ekblad (despite middling hit totals) is going to put up points and I think Puljujarvi has similar potential to Norris and it's now or never for him. But it is largely dependent upon the answers to the above questions. If you are not competitive now, and have a young rebuilding squad, I might side with Norris/Lundkvist.

[Feenom]

Yes I’d do it. Ekblad is already enough to do the deal and the fact that pool party is added in is a bonus. Ekblad is still young and hasn’t hit his ceiling yet. I think you are thinking too much about it. Good luck.

[Palefa]

Hi

Here is the roster. I am competing but I am pretty much solid on the defense. I feel that if I am giving up young asset is to improve the offensive

1. McDavid
2. Point
3. Aho
4. Teravainen
5. Seguin
6. Fiala
7. Garland
8. Konecny
9. Necas
10. Buchnevich
11. W. Karlsson
12. Batherson
13. Norris
14. Caufield

1. Chabot
2. Petry
3. Pietrangelo
4. Makar
5. Pulock
6. Lundkvist

1. Vasilevskyi
2. Kuemper

[random-d]

This seems like an easy win for you. I would mash accept.