Ullmark or Andersen

[SPOILER]

I'm looking to acquiring another goalie this off-season. Another manager is not interested in keeping Ullmark and Andersen, so I can make a pitch without hurting my current protectables.

Which one do you prefer this season - scoring cats - Wins, GAA, SV%

Thoughts?

[Paches6767]

Ullmark for me. Boston brought him in for a reason. He was great with the Sabers (when he was injured they just didn't win games and there's a reason for that).
Will see a split with sway for the start of the season but should see a good amount of starts given he performs to the level they think he can

[Dr.Brad]

Dayumm. I’ve got picks 9 and 14 in one of my leagues, and would pick either of these guys, over available GKs Talbot, Petersen, or Samsonov.

Between expectations for these two? Close, but I believe Boston’s elite guys’ age (Bergeron, Marchand, Hall) catches up with them faster than Carolina’s defense fades under Rod Brind’Amour. Edge: Andersen

[Feenom]

Tough one but I’d give the slightest edge to Andersen. I don’t like his nagging injuries but playing behind that team should get him really solid stats. Ullmark did well when he played so like I said it is a toss up, just going with the better overall team in front of the goalie here. Just hope Andersen can stay healthy.

[Aviator]

Ullmark is the better goalie, now on a good team and in my opinion, he will have better GAA and SV%.
Andersen should get more starts and thus wins.
Who is cheaper to acquire? That would probably decide it for me.

[StuM]

Ullmark is the better goalie, now on a good team and in my opinion, he will have better GAA and SV%.
Andersen should get more starts and thus wins.
Who is cheaper to acquire? That would probably decide it for me.

This makes sense to me.

[stevegamer]

This could be close enough that I want to know if the cost for either is the same. I lean towards whomever is cheaper..