Thomas Harley

[Nylander2.0]

I'd take the Brannstrom offer. He's here now and frankly his offensive upside is equal to or better than the d-men in this draft, in my thinking.

definately better than Harley....i may do this too...

You boys fumbled the bag here lol

[Pengwin7]

@CoD - Just do a new thread next time.
I'm always looking to reply to the OP - not the latest post.

Harley is going to be solid.
I've been reading analysts who are now admitting "I missed on Nils Lundqvist".
When the player can't produce with team #2... it gets real time to consider dropping him.
Time to let him go.

[senryu]

You boys fumbled the bag here lol

This place is littered with my incorrect predictions. But you get exactly what you pay for!

[Nylander2.0]

I'd take the Brannstrom offer. He's here now and frankly his offensive upside is equal to or better than the d-men in this draft, in my thinking.

This place is littered with my incorrect predictions. But you get exactly what you pay for!

True haha

[jshed2]

I ended up with


Thomas Harley, Jack Quinn and 13th overall (Mason McIntosh)


For

Oskar Lindblom, 4th overall (Jesper Wallstedt taken) and 53rd overall

Funnily enough, they probably came out well ahead with Quinn and McTavish for Wallstedt & Lindblom

[senryu]

Funnily enough, they probably came out well ahead with Quinn and McTavish for Wallstedt & Lindblom

Mason McIntosh might not be Mason McTavish

https://www.eliteprospects.com/playe...mason-mcintosh

https://www.eliteprospects.com/playe...mason-mctavish

Knowing what we know now, I'd rather have Wallstedt.