Quick Poll - Hall vs Elhers + Hertl

[PLDizorm]

Hello gentleman's,

Once again I need your input !

I'm in a 12 teams H2H, each team keep 8 players (no restriction to position), we roster 3 lines (lw, c, rw) 4 d / 1 util/ 5 bench, stats = G, A, P, +/-, PPP, SOG, Hits , BLK

Which side would you rather have :

A) Taylor Hall
or
B) Elhers + Hertl

I have roster space so the guy I drop have no value. I’m thin at the C position so adding Hertl would be nice but I hate losing the PPP that Hall bring ... that being said with Laine gone Elhers is poised for more exposure ... please give me your 2 cents !

Thanks again

[pmorrow]

Certainly helps you this year, assuming there aren't comparable players to Hertl available.

So assuming you don't keep Hertl you will be going from Hall to Ehlers as a keeper. I still have Hall slightly above Ehlers in terms of keeper value but if Ehlers keeps producing like he is right now then maybe the gap isn't there, especially with Ehlers being a bit younger.

Seems like a decent offer, but the questions to ask is if you are okay with the change to your keepers and is it worth it to get Hertl vs just keeping Hall and adding a poor man's Hertl off the free agent pile.

[renello]

I take the Hertl elhers side.

[hockeyrobot]

I like the Ehlers / Hertl side.

[LuigiC173]

Ehlers is better than Hall IMO so take that deal and run