Highway robbery.
Second team in sig.
Guentzel for MAF and Hornqvist.
Guy with Guentzel didn't pick a goalie until final two rounds. Desperately needs a goalie. Has Dubnyk and Stalock. How one sided is this trade? Veto?
12 team pts league. G(1pt), A(1pt), PPP(1pt), SHP(1pt), GWG(1pt), W(3pts), SO(2pts)
2C, 2RW, 2LW, 4F, 4D, 2G, 4Bench, 2IR
Keep any 5 max 3 years
C - McDavid, Backstrom, Tavares, Couturier, Trochek
RW - Pavelski, Fiala, E. Lindholm
LW - Landeskog, Palat, E. Kane, Robertson
D - Hedman, Yandle, Fox, Provorov
G - Lehner, Rask, MAF, Talbot
Originally I offered MAF and Pavelski. He wanted Binnington. I said no. He asked for MAF and Kaprizov and I offered Hornqvist instead. He says thats the best offer he got for a goalie that will win some games. If he can't get in the minimum 4 games played for goalies a week, he will lose out on all the goalie stats. So, he accepted and some guys are talking about vetoing the trade. The problem is he is screwed and needs a goalie so badly that the supply and demand puts a huge price for a goalie. How upset should we be if its vetoed?
12 team pts league. G(1pt), A(1pt), PPP(1pt), SHP(1pt), GWG(1pt), W(3pts), SO(2pts)
2C, 2RW, 2LW, 4F, 4D, 2G, 4Bench, 2IR
Keep any 5 max 3 years
C - McDavid, Backstrom, Tavares, Couturier, Trochek
RW - Pavelski, Fiala, E. Lindholm
LW - Landeskog, Palat, E. Kane, Robertson
D - Hedman, Yandle, Fox, Provorov
G - Lehner, Rask, MAF, Talbot
This should never be vetoed, irrespective on how one-sided it may appear to some people. If the other manager is desperate and willing to overpay (perceived), then that's up to that manager. It's not up to other people to manage your teams.
12 Team H2H Keep 4
2 C, 4 W, 4 D, 2 UTIL, 2 G
G, A, +/-, PPP, SOG, FW: W, SV%, GAA
C: Barkov, Eichel
W: Connor
D:
G: Sorokin
IR:
NA: