I don't know why but I've always loved him.
He'll go elsewhere if he can't be in the top 6
What's everyone's thoughts on Kravtsov? Still a blue chip prospect? Dobber's comp is Panarin...
When does he become relevant for fantasy? RW looks a little jammed up in NY, with Buch and Kakko...
I don't know why but I've always loved him.
He'll go elsewhere if he can't be in the top 6
31 TEAMS keep all multi-cat (lot of them) dynasty
Offensive stats : Goals, Assist , PPP, PPTOI, SOG...
Defensive stats : PKTOI, BLKS, TakeAway, Giveaway...
(basically best NHL player)
Talent always wins out, so don't worry too much about a logjam in front of him.
I don't think he has Panarin upside, but maybe the style is similar. Upside is probably closer to Filip Forsberg.
- - - Updated - - -
If he makes it.
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)
He is. But never seems to be able to hit a point per game. That's kind of where I could see Kravstov fitting in best case scenario at this point in a bunch of seasons over 60 points. It's probably more likely that he only ends up with a few in the 50s though, as his development seems to be stalling.
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)
No he is not a blue chip prospect IMO. He was likely a reach where the Rangers took him, then he had one very solid season and one below average-to-poor season. Solid prospect but not blue chip as there is a lot of uncertainty.
14 Teams H2H Dynasty, 28 roster spots (8 bench), 15 minors under 100
Weekly Matchups - Daily Lineups
Skaters: G/A/Pt/PIM/SoG/STP/H+B/ToI/Corsi
Goalies: W/GAA/SVs/SV%/SHO
C: Eichel, Kadri, Mcdavid, Sodeberg, Schenn
LW: Ehlers, Landeskog, Meier, Debrusk, Foegele, Lee
RW: Pastrnak, Marner, Palmieri, Terry, D. Brown, Bailey, Granlund
D: Krug, Josi, Ekholm, Faulk, Muzzin, Karlsson, Cernak,
G: Hellebuyck, Biship, M Jones
For me, Kravtsov is one of the hard prospects to evaluate.
He's both looked great (in small samples) and looked average (in other, small samples).
I feel like too many people are evaluating based on what they've seen in one of those small samples.
He has looked great in tournament play.
He has looked questionable in some AHL/KHL play.
I think we are kidding ourselves if we think we know at this point.
He's a 45-75pt range guy for me... I just don't know.
For fantasy hockey, if you have somebody who is gaga on him... sell.
If you have somebody with a stockpile of more recently hyped prospects... buy.
Thanks for the replies guys... yeah I basically feel the same way - Kind of a wild card...
Not crazy about the 60 pt valuation - good, but not great
He is on the block in one of my leagues and I'm gauging whether or not to try and buy low... if thats even possible