Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
Hi all, San Jose team in my sig (takes you to a google doc which shows points and all my players etc inc farm).
DeAngelo is on the table for one of these prospects: Comtois, Brannstrom, Sorokin, Podkolzin, Kakko (I would probably rate getting rid of them in that order right now) who do you guys think I should trade, if any? Worth noting if you don't click on the link hits/blocks are included.
Info not in the doc: Came 1st in my division (4teams) last season, 2nd (joint on points) in the conference (8teams) and I'm considered one of the best teams in the league.
Thanks
JJJ
Team One (Mercenaries Of Mandalore) 24T Dynasty, 4LW/RW/C, 6D, 2G, 4B - G, A1, A2, PPG, PPA, SHP, SOG, FOW, FOL, TK, GV, HIT, BLK, FT, ||| W, L, GA, SV, SHO, A
Team Two (Hamilton Tigers) 16T Dynasty - 3LW/RW/C, 6D, 2G, 6B - G, A, PPP, SHP, SOG, BLK, HIT, FOW| W, L, GA, SV, SHO, A
Click here for my teams (not up to date)
Links are too a google document.
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
First off, you have to do some kind of deal. DeAngelo for most any prospect out there is a win if you're getting DeAngelo. In order of preference to trade away, I'd say
Comtois
Podkolzin
Brannstrom
Kakko
with Sorokin being the guy I'd most want to keep.
Comtois seems like a 3rd line kind of guy and I'm not sure he carves out the offensive role we'd want with so many young Anaheim skaters from which to choose. This is especially true if ANA picks a forward this autumn.
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
I would trade Podkzin or Contois for DeAngelo in a heartbeat!
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
Maybe won't happen lol. Guy is extremely infuriating to trade with, always changes his mind moments later. Went from 'these prospects one for one' to 'Kakko and Sorokin for Deangelo' which I'm not doing lol. Will update if I manage something!
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
Walk away.
Want a Signature? Go to Settings, and you'll find Edit Signature down the list on the left.
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
If it looks like it's too good to be true, well, it's likely too good to be true. Not surprised the other guy bailed. The deal on the table now as swung completely the other way. Pass.
14 Team Roto; Keep 25; 12 F, 6 D, 2 G; 10 Farm; 5 Bench; 5 IR;
Salary Cap - 102.5 Mil
Scoring Cats: G, A, Pts, PIM, Hits, BS, SOG, F Points, D Points; Win+Ties+SO, GAA, SV%
Keepers
F: Aho, Larkin, DeBrincat, Vrana, Bennett, Scheifele, Kakko,Tolvanen, McBain,
D: Heiskanen, Fox, Toews, Lundqvist
G: Swayman, Andersen, Copley
Drops
F: Gaudreau, Terravainen, Puljujarvi, Kravstov, Zary
D: Brannstrom, Cernak, Alexeyev
G: Korpisalo, Merzlikins
FARM: Rossi, Berggren, Holtz, Savoie, Clarke, Tarasov, Wolf
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
Kakko and Sorokin are clear no-go for me here.
The first name that would tempt me to move out would be Brannstrom. Yes he's going to be very good but so is DeAngelo with less growing pains.
If you can do a 1 for 1 with Brannstrom, I'd consider that.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
I 2nd this. I think this makes the most sense. I personally think comtois has a chance to become a very good multi cat guy. Sorokin and kakko is a no go. Most wouldn't do a 1-1 with either of those two. I'd offer brannstrom or podkolzin maybe with an add for Tony dOriginally Posted by Axeman33
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
i think Branstrom and Podkolizn are the 2 here you should consider...
Branstrom will be same or better offensively but will take time and Deangelo provides more physical stats
Podkolzin will be worth more then Deangelo in my mind as soon as summer 2022...but thats 2 years away and if you competing i do this deal
Comtois i would keep just cause he will play next year and if you compete, well you want his production.
Kakko and Sorokin are untouchable unless much better player is offered.
14 Teams H2H Dynasty, 28 roster spots (8 bench), 15 minors under 100
Weekly Matchups - Daily Lineups
Skaters: G/A/Pt/PIM/SoG/STP/H+B/ToI/Corsi
Goalies: W/GAA/SVs/SV%/SHO
C: Eichel, Kadri, Mcdavid, Sodeberg, Schenn
LW: Ehlers, Landeskog, Meier, Debrusk, Foegele, Lee
RW: Pastrnak, Marner, Palmieri, Terry, D. Brown, Bailey, Granlund
D: Krug, Josi, Ekholm, Faulk, Muzzin, Karlsson, Cernak,
G: Hellebuyck, Biship, M Jones
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
I would not trade for DeAngelo because there is no telling what his future holds. I do not see the Rangers giving him the term and dollars he will want after this season with Lundkvist ready to come over from Sweden who is also a righty. Fox is also far cheaper too.
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
Fair point! However, if the Rangers do not invest long term on DeAngelo, he'll likely be traded to a team that needs him badly. I just don't see him walking away for nothing. Wether it's in NY or not, DeAngelo should keep his PP time and top pairing minutes.
12 teams - points only, keep all
20 players ( 8 FWD - 4 DEF - 2 GK + BENCH)
FWD
Kucherov
Kuznetsov
Crosby
Kane
Lindholm
Aho
J.Hughes
Landeskog
DEF
Hamilton, Jones, Montour, Letang
G
Markstrom, Grubauer
BENCH
Glass, Gustafsson, Tolvanen, Andersson, Levi
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
I agree but for the OP does he want to gamble on a situation that is not clear at this point in time.
Re: Which prospect to give up for Deangelo?
Comtois for me
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote