Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Landeskog or Vrana

  1. #16
    Location
    Brampton, Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Supreme Grand Master

    Default Re: Landeskog or Vrana

    What would the 10th overall net you if you were to move that separately for a win-now upgrade?
    Capped writer for DobberHockey. Find the latest articles here: https://dobberhockey.com/category/hockey-home/capped/
    (No I don't have a hockey problem...)

  2. #17
    jhonny's Avatar
    jhonny is offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    993
    Location
    Philly
    Rep Power
    15

    Dobber Sports Initiate

    Default Re: Landeskog or Vrana

    I'm with many here in that you should try to upgrade the pick (maybe do pick swap if he doesn't have many options)... In points only, I really don't mind losing Landy for Vrana+. Multicat is where Landy becomes gold.
    10 Team H2H Points (Keep 1C, 2W, 2D, 1G, & 1 non-goalie):
    G,A,+/-, PIM, PPG, SHG, GWG, OTG, FWs, Hits, Blks, Maj, Mis, (bonus scoring for D-men makes them comparable to Wing)
    Wins, Saves, GA, Shutouts

    18 Man Roster (2 IR slots) Daily Start: 2C, 4W, 4D, 2G

    C: MacKinnon, Zibanejad, Horvat, Kopitar
    W: Pastrnak, Rantanen, M. Tkachuk, Landeskog, R. Smith
    D: Carlson, Makar, Petry, Pulock, Fox
    G: Holtby, Markstrom, Lehner, Samsonov, Shesterkin

  3. #18
    chuckcouples's Avatar
    chuckcouples is online now
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,265
    Location
    Beaumont, AB
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Genius

    Default Re: Landeskog or Vrana

    I prefer Landeskog especially for a team trying to compete this season. If you can get a better pick and use that plus Vrana to get an upgrade on Landeskog, then that makes sense. Barring that, I would stick with Landeskog.

  4. #19
    Rep Power
    4

    Dobber Sports Prodigy

    Default Re: Landeskog or Vrana

    I think I'd take Vrana + 10th OA

    Landeskog has been practicing on the 2nd line lately and I could see that sticking if they want to diversify their offense or if they add another top 6 forward in the offseason.

    Also, most power forwards are drastically slowing down around their 30's, his value could change in a heartbeat (Simmonds, Benn, ...)

  5. #20
    Location
    Brampton, Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Supreme Grand Master

    Default Re: Landeskog or Vrana

    Quote Originally Posted by DJ Rection View Post
    I think I'd take Vrana + 10th OA

    Landeskog has been practicing on the 2nd line lately and I could see that sticking if they want to diversify their offense or if they add another top 6 forward in the offseason.

    Also, most power forwards are drastically slowing down around their 30's, his value could change in a heartbeat (Simmonds, Benn, ...)
    I don't disagree that it could end up being decent value, however if I'm trading Landeskog right now I'm selling him on his upside. His name and production over the last few years should net you a better asset on top of Vrana than the 10th overall, or a third solid asset on top of both.
    Capped writer for DobberHockey. Find the latest articles here: https://dobberhockey.com/category/hockey-home/capped/
    (No I don't have a hockey problem...)

  6. #21
    Rep Power
    4

    Dobber Sports Prodigy

    Default Re: Landeskog or Vrana

    Quote Originally Posted by Eskimo Brother View Post
    I don't disagree that it could end up being decent value, however if I'm trading Landeskog right now I'm selling him on his upside. His name and production over the last few years should net you a better asset on top of Vrana than the 10th overall, or a third solid asset on top of both.
    I'd agree on that in a multicat format, but in a points only format I think it's really fair

  7. #22
    Location
    Brampton, Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Supreme Grand Master

    Default Re: Landeskog or Vrana

    Quote Originally Posted by DJ Rection View Post
    I'd agree on that in a multicat format, but in a points only format I think it's really fair
    I think the name value and the MacKinnon factor can still net you a little more. With the additional sour taste in the Vrana owner's mouth just because he hasn't gotten the PP or top line opportunities to really shine (Ehlers lite).
    Capped writer for DobberHockey. Find the latest articles here: https://dobberhockey.com/category/hockey-home/capped/
    (No I don't have a hockey problem...)

  8. #23
    chuckcouples's Avatar
    chuckcouples is online now
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    4,265
    Location
    Beaumont, AB
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Genius

    Default Re: Landeskog or Vrana

    I agree with EB. Landeskog's name value should have him as much more valuable than Vrana.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •