The question that immediately came to mind is why is Larsson roughly the value of Makar/Trouba? Comparing to Makar, in my opinion, there's no way that a guy with 15-20 points a season should be near equal value to a guy who had 50 points in 57 games this season. Way too much emphasis on the peripherals.
Out of interest, what are the point values per category? Maybe even put them in your signature.
Team One (Mercenaries Of Mandalore) 24T Dynasty, 4LW/RW/C, 6D, 2G, 4B - G, A1, A2, PPG, PPA, SHP, SOG, FOW, FOL, TK, GV, HIT, BLK, FT, ||| W, L, GA, SV, SHO, A
Team Two (Hamilton Tigers) 16T Dynasty - 3LW/RW/C, 6D, 2G, 6B - G, A, PPP, SHP, SOG, BLK, HIT, FOW| W, L, GA, SV, SHO, A
Click here for my teams (not up to date)
Links are too a google document.
Ok but I'd rather not have to go to an external site/document just to see the basic settings. Just a suggestion - if you put categories in your signature, it should be clear on the format e.g. H2H/roto/weighted points etc.
Maybe just list them in the thread, then?
Edit: I know this is not the main question so not trying to take the focus away from your OP. I just was wondering if you felt that Larsson has too much value in such a format?