Lindholm > Dubois
12-man 10 keepers per team (I did finish in 1st place entering the playoffs)
Stats are: G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, FW, HIT, BLK
* Yearly ranks are in parentheses.
C: Tavares (72)
C: O'Reiley (39)
LW: JT Miller (5)
LW: Schenn (29)
RW: Svech (33)
RW: Stone (65)
D: Carlson (17)
D: Doughty (186)
Utility: ????
So for my utility spot I have either ELindholm (75) or PDubois (77) or ALee (99). My first goal is to trade one of my lesser keepers for a draft pick or possibly a Doughty upgrade. If not, would you go PLD or Lindholm? Lindholm gets more FW than PLD and he has that RW eligibility in addition to C. Centers are always easier to find during the season or in the draft. But PLD will be turning 22 and he has another level to get to which I don't think Lindholm has IMO. How say you?
10 Team, 60 Player Roster
G, A, PTS, PPP, PIM, BLKs, Hits, +/-, Shots, W, GAA, SV%, Saves
C- JHughes, Trocheck, RThomas, Zegras, Norris, Bennett, PLD, Stephenson, Danualt
RW- Raymond, Stone, TWilson, Toffoli, KJohnson, Nyqvist, Zary
LW- Keller, Schmaltz, Bunting, Skinner, Barbashev, Duclair
D- QHughes, McAvoy, Doughty, Heiskanen, LHughes, Mintyukov
G- Shesterkin, Demko, Andersen, Kahkonen, Levi, Tarasov, Annunen
Notable Prospects- Nikishin, Kulich, Leonard, Wood, Perreault, Lekkermaki, Ostlund, Othmman, REvans, L-Heureux, Ivanov, Murashov
Lindholm > Dubois
Contact me for Frozen Tools bug reports and inquiries
Follow Frozen Tools on Twitter @FrozenTools
Follow me on Twitter @DH_EricDaoust
I am guessing those ranks in parentheses are overall. It'd be helpful to see the D split out just among D.
I'd take Lindholm over DuBois for the positional eligibility, and the team factor. However, you do have another interesting option, looking at your centermen:
Taveres (72)
Lindholm (75)
Dubois (79)
I realize it's just one year, but that's really close, and I bet Tavares could fetch you a much bigger upgrade over Doughty than either Lindholm or DuBois can.
Want a Signature? Go to Settings, and you'll find Edit Signature down the list on the left.
with hits and PIM.. why aren't you taking Tom Wilson and his 50+PT pace?
Follow me on twitter: @doylelb4
10 Team, 60 Player Roster
G, A, PTS, PPP, PIM, BLKs, Hits, +/-, Shots, W, GAA, SV%, Saves
C- JHughes, Trocheck, RThomas, Zegras, Norris, Bennett, PLD, Stephenson, Danualt
RW- Raymond, Stone, TWilson, Toffoli, KJohnson, Nyqvist, Zary
LW- Keller, Schmaltz, Bunting, Skinner, Barbashev, Duclair
D- QHughes, McAvoy, Doughty, Heiskanen, LHughes, Mintyukov
G- Shesterkin, Demko, Andersen, Kahkonen, Levi, Tarasov, Annunen
Notable Prospects- Nikishin, Kulich, Leonard, Wood, Perreault, Lekkermaki, Ostlund, Othmman, REvans, L-Heureux, Ivanov, Murashov
10 Team, 60 Player Roster
G, A, PTS, PPP, PIM, BLKs, Hits, +/-, Shots, W, GAA, SV%, Saves
C- JHughes, Trocheck, RThomas, Zegras, Norris, Bennett, PLD, Stephenson, Danualt
RW- Raymond, Stone, TWilson, Toffoli, KJohnson, Nyqvist, Zary
LW- Keller, Schmaltz, Bunting, Skinner, Barbashev, Duclair
D- QHughes, McAvoy, Doughty, Heiskanen, LHughes, Mintyukov
G- Shesterkin, Demko, Andersen, Kahkonen, Levi, Tarasov, Annunen
Notable Prospects- Nikishin, Kulich, Leonard, Wood, Perreault, Lekkermaki, Ostlund, Othmman, REvans, L-Heureux, Ivanov, Murashov
I think I take Dubois here. Lindholm's shooting percentages are a little high for my liking (although it's been relatively consistent over his time in Calgary, I still think they're too high). Dubois 5on5 is a little high too, so it's still a tough question.