Just Gave Huberdeau and Seguin for a Late 1st! Crazy?

[Rockies & Hockeys]

For team in signature. Sounds steep, but I was going to lose Seguin for nothing (wasn’t keeping him, had shopped him with no takers), and I turned an 11th round pick into a 1st. My last keeper will be Tarasenko instead of Huberdeau. A downgrade to be sure, but I think I can make up the difference in the extra first rounder I have. A massive part of how I’ve won 3 years in a row is by getting a big load of killer draft picks each year. It’s a 13 round draft and my lowest is now a 7th. Along the way I’ve given up guys like Vas, Marner, Reilly, and others, but that’s the cost of having such draft capital. Thoughts? You guys ever go after high picks this aggressively?

[Skippy]

Yes. Yes I do. Check my signature. I have 15 of the first 30 picks in a 16 round draft and the first 4 selections overall.

Whatever you are doing, don’t stop. You are the back to back to back champ.

We should be friends. Enemies if we were in the same league.

[HonkyTonkMan]

Don't overthink it - whatever you're doing is working

[stevegamer]

The only thing you need to change is the sensational thread titles.

If you gave up both of these players that you could've kept, that'd be crazy. This is Huberdeau and a non-keeper for the late first. A good deal, clearly.

[j0hn_d0e]

The only thing you need to change is the sensational thread titles.

If you gave up both of these players that you could've kept, that'd be crazy. This is Huberdeau and a non-keeper for the late first. A good deal, clearly.

^ what the genius said.

[DusterDave]

If it has worked in the past than keep doing what you are doing but wouldn't you want to keep Seguin over Tarasenko?