Radulov vs Hanifin for keeper rep given

[mormerod]

The pool is in my signature. I can keep either of these guys forup to another 4 years. My original thought was Radulov, but the addition of Pavalski has me thinking twice. I do have holes at D, but we haven't drafted yet, and I have a couple of good options in the minors with Q Hughes and Boqvist.

[DusterDave]

Don’t over think it. Keep Radulov.

[lucafen4]

If you didn't have Radulov... I think I could find another player on your roster you should keep over Hanifin as well.

Having 4 scoring forwards should only help Radulov. Much harder for teams to pin down the big 3.

[ericdaoust]

Keep Radulov and focus on D at the draft.

[Brosive]

Don’t over think it. Keep Radulov.

I agree. Radulov has steadily produced since being in Dallas, and I don't expect that to change.
I'm hoping for a Benn bounce back which would help even more

[mounD]

The way Radulov plays he should be a good player well into the back nine of his career. I'd keep him here no hesitation.

[senryu]

It's Radulov. Hanifin is veering into Ekblad territory. Better in real life than fantasy.

[lucafen4]

It's Radulov. Hanifin is veering into Ekblad territory. Better in real life than fantasy.

Worse... Ekblad at least shoots a tonne and blocks a fair amount, Hanifin, statistically seems to just skate around avoiding incidental contact with both puck and player

[senryu]

Hanifin, statistically seems to just skate around avoiding incidental contact with both puck and player

Admittedly, this is what I would do were I forced to play in the NHL.

[stevegamer]

Hanifin is a guy I don't think you want for more than one year. He's just not that good. Radulov by a mile/kilometer.

[mormerod]

The other players are already keepers.

- - - Updated - - -

The others are already keepers.

[j0hn_d0e]

Thats easy - keep Radulov. This is a different Radulov compared to the one who got drunk with fellow Kostitsyn at the middle of the night after a playoff lose. I'm not longer here.