Reply With QuoteI prefer Cernak right now, as he should have an increased role on the TB blueline and he's already a great option for the grit categories. It's usually preferable to get the value now, and Cernak is the guy who has immediate value.
Hague vs Cernak
Should I pick Cernak in upcoming draft but would have to drop Hague to make a room on my prospect roster (Cernak still qualifies as a prospect in my league).
G, A, PPP, SOG, Pims, HITs, BLK
I almost view them very identical in a nutshell. Tons of shots, hits, a moderate amount of points and Blocks. Obviously Cernak has a leg up already thus a dilemma. But I am hesitant here as Hague may have a better opportunity in a season or two as he doesn’t have to fight off Hedman and Sergachev. Theodore would be the only competition for Hague and even then , not sure if they’re playing on a same side.
Thx
Re: Hague vs Cernak
I prefer Cernak right now, as he should have an increased role on the TB blueline and he's already a great option for the grit categories. It's usually preferable to get the value now, and Cernak is the guy who has immediate value.
MounD - Double Threat FHL (18-19 champs)
10-Team Yahoo daily H2H Dynasty
3C, 3LW, 3RW, 6D, 2G, 7Bn (IR)
G, A, +/-, PPP, SHP, SOG, FW, HIT, BLK // W, Sv, GAA, Sv%, SHO
C: Bergeron, Barkov, Aho, Point, Kadri
LW: Marchand, Landeskog, Hertl, Marchessault
RW: Stamkos, Tarasenko, Laine, Palmieri
D: Carlson, Letang, Dumba, Weber, Pietrangelo, Ristolainen, Byfuglien*
G: Bobrovsky, Holtby, Lehner, Greiss-Varlamov
Farm: Turcotte, Cozens, Denisenko, Newhook // Sandin, Jokiharju, Dobson, K'Andre // Shesterkin
Re: Hague vs Cernak
I own both. Our setups are not greatly different. I would keep Cernak over Hague. We know Cernak is a top 4 D on TBL this year and going forward. His minutes are going to go up. He shoots a decent amount for a defensive D. He will score points by osmosis. And he will rack up mad periphs. I wouldnt mind seeing a few more penalty minutes. Radko Gudas emerged onto TB several years ago and was a destroyer for a couple of seasons in multi-cat. I am feeling confident Cernak is going to have a big impact in the right scoring systems.
Re: Hague vs Cernak
Cernak 100%
Re: Hague vs Cernak
If you're drafting Cernak to be in your minors and not on your main roster, I'd just keep Hague. I see a much better upside in that kid compared to Cernak. I see Hague as a future 3/4 Dman where as Cernak us a bottom pairing guy.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: Hague vs Cernak
Thanks to all for responding! I think I will compromise here. I’ll try to draft Cernak in a 2d round ( 5 rounds prospect draft , 12 teams league) and keep Hague. But I’ll have to forfeit my last pick in a 5th round. I haven’t planned to do this originally as I’d prefer to draft extra forward but I’ve learned during my FH escapades that there’s no such thing as “Too many D-men”. lol
Posting Permissions