Re: Kerfoot or Palat
Generally I prefer Palat...he should get regular top 6 minutes and secondary PP time, especially with JT Miller gone. That said, if you are weak at center and need the FWs, then perhaps Kerfoot is the better option.
FWIW, I foresee low 50s for Palat and low 40s for Kerfoot, so Palat will out point Kerfoot. The decision will come down to roster needs and the FW category, I suppose.
12 team, H2H, salary cap
1 pt/G or A, 2 pts/W, 1 pt/OTL, 1 pt/SO
Forward: B. Point, M. Necas, A. Debrincat, T. Zegras, J. Bratt, L. Raymond
Defense: J. Morrissey, A. DeAngelo, S. Gostisbehere, D. Doughty
Goalie: T. Demko, E. Merzlikins
Bench: M. Rossi, C. Glass, M. Maccelli, M. Dumba, K. Shattenkirk, F. Andersen
Prospects of Note: L. Stankoven, J. Lekkerimaki, D. Yurov, B. Clarke
League has been running continuously since 1997-98