Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Kerfoot or Palat

  1. #1
    rtstr's Avatar
    rtstr is offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,262
    Rep Power
    47

    Dobber Sports Pro

    Default Kerfoot or Palat

    Who do you prefer in multi-category dynasty leagues? Faceoffs count.

  2. #2
    Location
    Brampton, Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Titan

    Default Re: Kerfoot or Palat

    What are the exact categories, and how deep is your league & rosters? C/W really gets affected by that.
    Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
    (No I don't have a hockey problem...)

  3. #3
    SeaDawg's Avatar
    SeaDawg is offline
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,662
    Location
    Ottawa
    Rep Power
    50

    The Great One

    Default Re: Kerfoot or Palat

    Generally I prefer Palat...he should get regular top 6 minutes and secondary PP time, especially with JT Miller gone. That said, if you are weak at center and need the FWs, then perhaps Kerfoot is the better option.

    FWIW, I foresee low 50s for Palat and low 40s for Kerfoot, so Palat will out point Kerfoot. The decision will come down to roster needs and the FW category, I suppose.
    12 team, H2H, salary cap
    1 pt/G or A, 2 pts/W, 1 pt/OTL, 1 pt/SO

    Forward: B. Point, M. Necas, A. Debrincat, T. Zegras, J. Bratt, L. Raymond
    Defense: J. Morrissey, A. DeAngelo, S. Gostisbehere, D. Doughty
    Goalie: T. Demko, E. Merzlikins
    Bench: M. Rossi, C. Glass, M. Maccelli, M. Dumba, K. Shattenkirk, F. Andersen
    Prospects of Note: L. Stankoven, J. Lekkerimaki, D. Yurov, B. Clarke

    League has been running continuously since 1997-98

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •