Wilson or Chiasson ROS??

[nitcha1012]

Curious as to your opinion ROS. I have Wilson who was tearing it up pre-concussion. Stick with him or drop for Chiasson who seems to be sticking with McDavid, currently? The Cirelli kid on TB is also available.
Goals, assists, shots, face-offs, blocks and hits.

Appreciate any thoughts.
Thanks

[ericdaoust]

Why does it have to be a ROS decision? Do you have a limited amount of moves available?

Tom Wilson
Cirelli
Chiasson
Colin Wilson

[nitcha1012]

good point, doesn't need to be ROS. Can switch out weekly if they're still available. Figured it would be a way to compare which one is worth dropping, assuming they wont stay available for long.
Yes to clarify I have Tom Wilson.

Thanks for the input!

[03t444e]

Since its a hits league, you keep Wilson in my opinion, as that category is a safeguard for a steep drop in production. Chiasson is the soup de jour on edmontons top line in Edmonton right now, but that is largely a revolving door

Their shooting percentages are both absurd right now, but Wilson shoots in the neighborhood of a shot per game more than Chiasson and obviously hits more anyways. once the scoring corrects for Chiasson, his value is largely diminished, so Wilson is the man here

[ericdaoust]

good point, doesn't need to be ROS. Can switch out weekly if they're still available. Figured it would be a way to compare which one is worth dropping, assuming they wont stay available for long.
Yes to clarify I have Tom Wilson.

Thanks for the input!

Short term:

Wilson
Chiasson
Cirelli

Long term:

Wilson
Cirelli
Chiasson

The latter two are appealing names but Wilson actually delivers production. That's what wins fantasy leagues.

[nitcha1012]

I appreciate all your input!! That's what I needed to keep me focused. I dropped Skinner after 2/3 weeks as a bum and been kicking myself ever since.
cheers!

[MZac]

I'd keep Wilson - if you drop him I imagine someone will pick him up. I think he'll be the most productive of the group.