Hill or McElhiney in a limited keeper

[tweetdrivr]

Just when I thought McE had locked down the starting gig in Carolina Mrazek gets a start on a non back to back. He lost but played well. Would you guys drop McElhinney for Hill? Hill could be the lightning in a bottle I’ve been looking for...

[GSD]

Both are hot. Both are short term. See who shoul get more games and better matchups over next 2 weeks.

[stevegamer]

Neither is likely to be worth keeping, but I think Hill is less likely to keep the starting job all year. Hill has played his way into making Pickard expendable, though. Hill may stick on Arizona's roster all year, though.

[als_revenge]

McE is more likely to be a starter throughout the year than Hill, IMO. What's not clear to me is if you are asking this question from a streaming perspective or a "rest of seasaon" perspective. I'd probably go with Hill for streaming, but McE if you are thinking a few months or more...

[tweetdrivr]

I was thinking more ROS. We can only roster two goalies and I’d rather keep someone who has a better chance of a starting gig. McElhinney turned in a real turd last night and I fear that’s a 1A/1B deal in Carolina all season. I don’t know that Hill can sustain this play but I also wonder if Raanta will get and remain healthy.

[lucafen4]

neither? is that an option. better chance McElhenney is a 1a/b platoon vs Hill, as Raanta's coming back from injury. There's just no risk of Mrazek taking the lions share ROS.

[tweetdrivr]

I guess. Kinkaid, Smith, Rittich, Howard, Markstrom, Lehner are available.