Re: Nylander....who's to blame
I still think it AM34 injury doesn't help Nylander unless they get blown out and are below 500 in the games AM34 misses.
If AM34 misses 20 games (it's gonna be between 16-25 it looks like based on schedule) and Toronto goes 10-10, 18-13 is still a good record (0.580winning percentage, roughly 95pts over 82game).
However, something to note, how quickly this came out and how tight lipped the Leafs organization is now, who knows if 4weeks is even a realistic number. They could know right now it's more like 8weeks but don't want to tell us. 8 weeks would be like 30 games, and a 23-18 isn't as good (92pts/82games).
To summarize what I think:
- AM34's injury length coincides with TML record. The longer he's out, their results will suffer (duh)
- If Toronto can survive 20 games without him going 500 or above, Nylander doesn't gain any weight in negotiation
- If Toronto gets blown apart in games, Nylander gains weight in negotiation.
Toronto has 2 centers who can play as top centers, they have the depth to handle this. Handle and succeed though are 2 very different situations.
12 Team, H2H, Keep 6 (in Bold)
G, A, Pts, PPP, FW, SOG, Hits, Blocks
W, Saves, S%, GAA, Game Started
2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 1Util, 2G, 5BN, 2IR, 1IR+, 1NA
C: Horvat, Trocheck
LW: J. Robertson, Byfield (C), Guenther
RW: Pavelski (C), Giroux (C), Svechnikov (LW)
D: Fox, Makar, Bouchard, Morrissey, Gudas
Util: Meier (LW, RW)
G: Oettinger, Georgiev, Samsonov, Woll