Reply With QuoteI mean they are close but I'd rather panarin. I think he's safer and closer to his prime. Panarin is a bit like dangerfield, no respect.
Giroux could likely see some regression from last season.
Giroux v Panarin
Goals 3
Assists 2
+/- 1/-1
GWG 1
Who do you prefer? Positions don't matter... Thanks!
Re: Giroux v Panarin
I mean they are close but I'd rather panarin. I think he's safer and closer to his prime. Panarin is a bit like dangerfield, no respect.
Giroux could likely see some regression from last season.
Set roster weekly in H2H (Mon to Sun) - 16 Teams - start 6F, 3D, and 1G per week - Keep 2
Points: 2 G / 2 A / 1 PPG / 1 PPA / 1 Hat Trick / 1 SHG / 1 SHA / 1 GWG - 3 Goalie Win / 2 Goalie Loss in SO or OT / 5 goalie SO
Forwards:
C. McDavid, N. Kucherov, R. O'Reilly, J. Schwartz, J. Toews, J. Huberdeau, T. Toffoli, M. Granlund
Defense:
B. Burns, J. Klingberg, R. Josi, J. Slavin
Goalie:
J. Binnington
IR (2 max):
Re: Giroux v Panarin
I think it depends a bit on your roster. If you have a bunch of players who's point totals vary significantly from year to year, I'd probably lean towards Panarin so you get some consistency. On the other hand, if you have steady performers it's probably worth the boom or bust risk of Giroux.
16 Team - Keep 5 - H2H Points
Start: 2C/2LW/2RW/4D/2G - 4Bench
G/A(1.25) STP(1.5) GWG(3) SOG(0.25) H(0.2) Blks(0.25) +/-(0.25) PIM(0.1) FOW(0.1)
C: Malkin, Kopitar, Hartman, Johansen
LW: Ovechkin, Pacioretty, Barbashev (C)
RW: Rust, Mangiapane (LW), Rodrigues (LW)
D: DeAngelo, Karlsson, Faulk, Morrisey, Myers
G: A. Forsberg, Price, Reimer, Holtby
Re: Giroux v Panarin
i prefer panarin mainly because he's in a contract year but i think they finish around the same this year
Posting Permissions