Horvat v Larkin v Hornqvist

[HonkyTonkMan]

Goals 3
Assists 2
+/- 1/-1

How do you rank them? Thanks

[HonkyTonkMan]

Plus minus is way too important FYI, hence Hornqvist in the conversation

[J0e Th0rnton]

Plus minus is impossible to accurately nail down. At best you take guys from teams that do not suck and avoid guys on teams that suck and even then it does not always tell the tale.

In this trio, Larkin is most likely to have a bad +/- AND scores the least amount of goals. So no Larkin

Horvat is playing top line C on a team that no longer has the Sedins in front of him eating PP time. He did miss some time last year to injury, but in general I expect him to hit around 25g-35a for 60 points and his +/- to hover around neutral without the Sedin twins holding him back

Hornqvist is the best goalscorer of the bunch(Worst for assists) and tends to get injured and miss 12-18 games a year(So reduce his expectations by 20%). His +/- is likely the safest of the bunch, but that is by no means a guarantee. If you don't play, you don't accumulate.


I take Horvat