Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

  1. #1
    Savvy1982's Avatar
    Savvy1982 is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,882
    Location
    Lethbridge, AB
    Rep Power
    47

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    Hey folks -

    My league just changed from starting 4 Defence to starting 3 D. + 1 Skater.

    Team is in my sig. Thinking of cutting Phaneuf and Walman to grab a goalie prospect like Shestyorkin or Hart. I could cut forwards (Suomela, Caggiula) instead.

    If I cut both, my D looks like:

    Starter 1: Barrie
    Starter 2: Krug
    Starter 3: Shattenkirk

    Bench 1: Matheson
    Bench 2: Honka
    Bench 3: Brannstrom

    Last year Phaneuf was worse than Shattenkirk but better than Matheson, Walman was obviously in the minors.

    Do I cut both? Cut just one? Hang onto both?
    18 Team Full Keeper. Total points.

    Start 10 F, 3 D, 1 UTIL, 1 G

    3 Points: SHO, 2 Points: G, PPA, SHG, SHA, W, 1 Point: A, PPG, GWG, .25 Points: BLK, .1 Points: FOW, SOG, SV, .15 Points: HIT, -.05 Points: FOL, -.15 Points: GA

    Forwards: Backstrom, Barre-Boulet, Beauvillier, Caufield, Dickinson, Donato, Donskoi, Gourde, Greenway, Horvat, Kase, Keller, Kuznetsov, MacKinnon, Marchessault, J. T. Miller, Sikura, Tarasenko, Zegras

    Defense: Barrie, Brannstrom, Cholowski, Honka, Matheson, Pulock, Shattenkirk

    Goal: Dubnyk, Jarry, Markstrom, Merzlikins



    2014-15, 2016-17 MHL Champions!

  2. #2
    Moses's Avatar
    Moses is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,242
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Genius

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    At first blush, of those names you just tossed out there, I'd like Phaneuf and Carter Hart over the rest of them -- and by a fair margin.
    - I said... "God damn this tablet is heavy!"

  3. #3
    Savvy1982's Avatar
    Savvy1982 is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,882
    Location
    Lethbridge, AB
    Rep Power
    47

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    Thanks Moses - That’s my take too. With Matheson, Honka, and Brannstrom I feel like having Walman is excessive, and having Phaneuf let’s me wait on them a year longer.
    18 Team Full Keeper. Total points.

    Start 10 F, 3 D, 1 UTIL, 1 G

    3 Points: SHO, 2 Points: G, PPA, SHG, SHA, W, 1 Point: A, PPG, GWG, .25 Points: BLK, .1 Points: FOW, SOG, SV, .15 Points: HIT, -.05 Points: FOL, -.15 Points: GA

    Forwards: Backstrom, Barre-Boulet, Beauvillier, Caufield, Dickinson, Donato, Donskoi, Gourde, Greenway, Horvat, Kase, Keller, Kuznetsov, MacKinnon, Marchessault, J. T. Miller, Sikura, Tarasenko, Zegras

    Defense: Barrie, Brannstrom, Cholowski, Honka, Matheson, Pulock, Shattenkirk

    Goal: Dubnyk, Jarry, Markstrom, Merzlikins



    2014-15, 2016-17 MHL Champions!

  4. #4
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Jedi

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    I'd actually consider Matheson over Phaneuf... just due to the upside. At best you get what Phaneuf gave last year, It's a longer hold on Matheson, but kid is going to explode in the next couple years.
    Follow me on twitter: @doylelb4

  5. #5
    Savvy1982's Avatar
    Savvy1982 is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,882
    Location
    Lethbridge, AB
    Rep Power
    47

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    I have no intention of dropping Matheson - in our format he's almost as good as Phaneuf already: I was just considering dumping Phaneuf or Walman to free up space for young a young F prospect and a young G prospect.
    18 Team Full Keeper. Total points.

    Start 10 F, 3 D, 1 UTIL, 1 G

    3 Points: SHO, 2 Points: G, PPA, SHG, SHA, W, 1 Point: A, PPG, GWG, .25 Points: BLK, .1 Points: FOW, SOG, SV, .15 Points: HIT, -.05 Points: FOL, -.15 Points: GA

    Forwards: Backstrom, Barre-Boulet, Beauvillier, Caufield, Dickinson, Donato, Donskoi, Gourde, Greenway, Horvat, Kase, Keller, Kuznetsov, MacKinnon, Marchessault, J. T. Miller, Sikura, Tarasenko, Zegras

    Defense: Barrie, Brannstrom, Cholowski, Honka, Matheson, Pulock, Shattenkirk

    Goal: Dubnyk, Jarry, Markstrom, Merzlikins



    2014-15, 2016-17 MHL Champions!

  6. #6
    Location
    Ottawa
    Rep Power
    50

    The Great One

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    I'd drop Walman and either of your F prospects and pick up both goalie specs.

  7. #7
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Jedi

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    Quote Originally Posted by als_revenge View Post
    I'd drop Walman and either of your F prospects and pick up both goalie specs.
    now that I am reading this correctly, I'd listen to ALS. and if you can only get one G - Hart, but by all means snag both over these 3.
    Follow me on twitter: @doylelb4

  8. #8
    Location
    Philadelphia area
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Grand Master

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    Quote Originally Posted by als_revenge View Post
    I'd drop Walman and either of your F prospects and pick up both goalie specs.
    This is sound advice. Phaneuf gives you one more year of coverage for your bench D, but he might be expendable as well, if you really like the forward prospects.
    Want a Signature? Go to Settings, and you'll find Edit Signature down the list on the left.

  9. #9
    Savvy1982's Avatar
    Savvy1982 is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,882
    Location
    Lethbridge, AB
    Rep Power
    47

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    Quote Originally Posted by stevegamer View Post
    This is sound advice. Phaneuf gives you one more year of coverage for your bench D, but he might be expendable as well, if you really like the forward prospects.
    There is some really great stuff this year - Donato, Kerfoot, DeBrusk, plus everyone drafted this year. It’s a deeper draft year than you might think.

    I just got Hudon, Donskoi, and Suomela (in that order) in our Free Agent Draft (Age 24+) last month, and I’m pretty darned happy to get those three.

    You think Phaneuf has one more year? I really only need him one more year, but if he’s garbage this year, I’d rather have a prospect in that slot.
    18 Team Full Keeper. Total points.

    Start 10 F, 3 D, 1 UTIL, 1 G

    3 Points: SHO, 2 Points: G, PPA, SHG, SHA, W, 1 Point: A, PPG, GWG, .25 Points: BLK, .1 Points: FOW, SOG, SV, .15 Points: HIT, -.05 Points: FOL, -.15 Points: GA

    Forwards: Backstrom, Barre-Boulet, Beauvillier, Caufield, Dickinson, Donato, Donskoi, Gourde, Greenway, Horvat, Kase, Keller, Kuznetsov, MacKinnon, Marchessault, J. T. Miller, Sikura, Tarasenko, Zegras

    Defense: Barrie, Brannstrom, Cholowski, Honka, Matheson, Pulock, Shattenkirk

    Goal: Dubnyk, Jarry, Markstrom, Merzlikins



    2014-15, 2016-17 MHL Champions!

  10. #10
    mounD's Avatar
    mounD is offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    8,483
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Giant

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    I’d easily drop Walman to grab Hart. No brainer for me.
    MounD - Double Threat FHL (18-19 champs)

    10-Team Yahoo daily H2H Dynasty
    3C, 3LW, 3RW, 6D, 2G, 7Bn (IR)
    G, A, +/-, PPP, SHP, SOG, FW, HIT, BLK // W, Sv, GAA, Sv%, SHO

    C: Bergeron, Barkov, Aho, Point, Kadri
    LW: Marchand, Landeskog, Hertl, Marchessault
    RW: Stamkos, Tarasenko, Laine, Palmieri
    D: Carlson, Letang, Dumba, Weber, Pietrangelo, Ristolainen, Byfuglien*
    G: Bobrovsky, Holtby, Lehner, Greiss-Varlamov

    Farm: Turcotte, Cozens, Denisenko, Newhook // Sandin, Jokiharju, Dobson, K'Andre // Shesterkin

  11. #11
    Rep Power
    9

    Dobber Sports Blue-Chipper

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    First guy I would cut is cagguila. Hes an anchor

  12. #12
    Savvy1982's Avatar
    Savvy1982 is offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,882
    Location
    Lethbridge, AB
    Rep Power
    47

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Re: Do I still need Phaneuf and/or Walman?

    Sounds good.

    Looks like the consensus is to drop Caggiula and Walman, and hang onto Phaneuf for at least one more year.

    Thanks everyone!
    18 Team Full Keeper. Total points.

    Start 10 F, 3 D, 1 UTIL, 1 G

    3 Points: SHO, 2 Points: G, PPA, SHG, SHA, W, 1 Point: A, PPG, GWG, .25 Points: BLK, .1 Points: FOW, SOG, SV, .15 Points: HIT, -.05 Points: FOL, -.15 Points: GA

    Forwards: Backstrom, Barre-Boulet, Beauvillier, Caufield, Dickinson, Donato, Donskoi, Gourde, Greenway, Horvat, Kase, Keller, Kuznetsov, MacKinnon, Marchessault, J. T. Miller, Sikura, Tarasenko, Zegras

    Defense: Barrie, Brannstrom, Cholowski, Honka, Matheson, Pulock, Shattenkirk

    Goal: Dubnyk, Jarry, Markstrom, Merzlikins



    2014-15, 2016-17 MHL Champions!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •