Reply With Quotego with Quick. He's about as steady as goalies come. Talbot is going to be challenged for the starting job this year and will drop starts just due to who the second goalie is.
lock it in - 35w 6so 2.4 gaa .920+svpct. As reliable as they come
Talbot vs Quick
Team and League stats in SIG
Currently in a win now situation lost last season by 1 point, just got offered Quick straight up for Talbot, should I stick with Talbot and hope for a bounce back season from EDM or go with the steady Quick.
14 Team (H2H Points) Dynasty League
C: McDavid, MacKinnon, Eichel, Zibanejad
LW: E.Kane, Panarin, Huberdeau, Marchand, Landeskog
RW: Rantanen, Zuccarello
D: Makar, Dahlin, Chychrun, Drysdale
G: Shesterkin, Saros, Markstrom
Prospects: Carlsson, Raty, Berggren, Miroshnichenko, Othmann, Clarke, Gulyayev, Nikishin, Wallstadt, Wolf
16 Team (H2H Points) Dynasty League
C: MacKinnon, Zibanejad, Duchene, Schenn, Johansen, Monahan, Krebs, Pageau
LW: E.Kane, Pacioretty, Vrana, Hoffman
RW: Tuch, Stone, Wilson, Batherson, Sprong, Gallagher, Wahlstrom
D: Dahlin, Hamilton, Letang, Dumba, Kylington, Liljegren
G: Allen
Prospects: Byfield, Guenther, Rossi, Perreault, Nikishin
Re: Talbot vs Quick
go with Quick. He's about as steady as goalies come. Talbot is going to be challenged for the starting job this year and will drop starts just due to who the second goalie is.
lock it in - 35w 6so 2.4 gaa .920+svpct. As reliable as they come
Follow me on twitter: @doylelb4
Re: Talbot vs Quick
Tough one. Quick is reliable when healthy but when Talbot is on, he's the better option IMO. Both are a bit of a gamble.
I guess I'd stick with Quick and hope for the best. I do think Talbot can bounce back next year but the safe play is Quick.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: Talbot vs Quick
Jonathan Quick has been one of the best goalies in the league for the past 7-8 years. Talbot has had maybe 2 - 2 1/2 good seasons under his belt and just came off a terrible one. Quick would be my guy here.
Re: Talbot vs Quick
I'd go with a proven veteran so I would definitely choose Quick. He has a more reliable record compared to Talbot.
Re: Talbot vs Quick
wait your sig says you have Quick (nice tandem btw lol, looks familiar). did you make the deal? if so, nice. if we've got it backwards, my advice is still quick over talbot. talbot and the oilers haven't proven themselves enough and i'd rather the steady quick than the risky upside gamble in talbot.
12 team H2H Most Cats Wins; Keep 6/winner keeps 7; G A PPP +/- SHP SOG HIT BLK PIM // W SV GAA SV% SHO
3 C, 3 LW, 3 RW, 6D, 2G, 5 bench
C - McDavid, Crosby, Tavares
LW - DeBrincat
RW - Meier, Miller
D -
G - Jarry
Re: Talbot vs Quick
Lol yeah I went ahead and took the dealOriginally Posted by pmorrow
14 Team (H2H Points) Dynasty League
C: McDavid, MacKinnon, Eichel, Zibanejad
LW: E.Kane, Panarin, Huberdeau, Marchand, Landeskog
RW: Rantanen, Zuccarello
D: Makar, Dahlin, Chychrun, Drysdale
G: Shesterkin, Saros, Markstrom
Prospects: Carlsson, Raty, Berggren, Miroshnichenko, Othmann, Clarke, Gulyayev, Nikishin, Wallstadt, Wolf
16 Team (H2H Points) Dynasty League
C: MacKinnon, Zibanejad, Duchene, Schenn, Johansen, Monahan, Krebs, Pageau
LW: E.Kane, Pacioretty, Vrana, Hoffman
RW: Tuch, Stone, Wilson, Batherson, Sprong, Gallagher, Wahlstrom
D: Dahlin, Hamilton, Letang, Dumba, Kylington, Liljegren
G: Allen
Prospects: Byfield, Guenther, Rossi, Perreault, Nikishin
Re: Talbot vs Quick
Why would he trade you Quick for Talbot? Is he an Oilers fan? Just curious from his point of view. Does this GM win a lot in your pool?
I think Quick will play less this year. LA will bring up a younger goalie to try and groom.
Re: Talbot vs Quick
Absolutely go with Quick, you made the right choice. Quick has been a model of consistency in the league for the last several years. GAA of 2.45 or better since 2010-2011 and is a lock for at least 0.915 sv%. I take him comfortably over Talbot vs hoping Talbot gets back to his season year before last.
Posting Permissions
