Vetoed Deal: Thoughts?

[Bazz]

Cats: FOW-C, G, A, PT, PIM, PPP, SOG, H+B

Team 1: Trades Nick Schmaltz and Victor Arvidsson

Team 2: Trades Tyson Jost and Nick Ritchie

Thoughts dobber nation?

[Axeman33]

All depends on team needs I suppose. One team (team 1) loses offense but the other team (team 2) loses the better peripherals. I prefer the Arvidsson side in this offer because I'd rather get my peripherals from my D but that's me.

[Bazz]

All depends on team needs I suppose. One team (team 1) loses offense but the other team (team 2) loses the better peripherals. I prefer the Arvidsson side in this offer because I'd rather get my peripherals from my D but that's me.

Yeah the only clear category given up was H+B, they were told if they added a lesser prospect a late 1 or 2 2nds it would be passed. Instead one of the owners started with a childish tantrum. I'd rep you Axe but I haven't spread enough love on the forums I guess.

[Axeman33]

Either way, no veto here.

[audiopile]

I don’t think it’s a fair trade but it isn’t veto worthy either. I gather trades are reviewed in your league? I would be irritated by the suggestions on how the deal should be tweaked, that’s up to the two parties making the trade, not the commish.

[Zorro]

This deal should absolutely not be veto'ed.. If this trade has been veto'ed then this league has zero chance of surviving long term..

[Bazz]

This deal should absolutely not be veto'ed.. If this trade has been veto'ed then this league has zero chance of surviving long term..

Can you tell me why it should be approved?

[tobias]

Should not be vetoed. Even if there is a clear winner (Team 2, getting Schmaltz and Arvidsson), there is no reason for it to be vetoed.

Team 1 gets peripherals, Team 2 gets points.

[Godin]

Can you tell me why it should be approved?

I can tell you. Just check out this thread.

https://forums.dobbersports.com/show...highlight=veto

[Martin5150]

No veto. Not even marginally close. Why would it be? What is T.Jost? You nor anyone can answer that. This deal is fine.

[ShawneePanthers]

This deal should absolutely not be veto'ed.. If this trade has been veto'ed then this league has zero chance of surviving long term..

Exactly what I was thinking

[stevegamer]

Can you tell me why it should be approved?

Sure.

1. Are the 2 owners are exchanging some non-league assets in this deal? Cash, liquor, favors of any sort, etc?
2. Are the 2 owners going to reverse this deal in the next week or month to essentially rent players or violate any other league rules?
3. Do the megastars in this trade all going to one team for absolutely nothing in return threaten league integrity?

Tell me which of those you answer yes. I KNOW it's not #3.

Follow-up:
Is it one of the upset owners involved in the deal? If so, he's correct to be upset, and he should leave the league and find a better one. I'm not sure that having one team add in a 1st round pick doesn't swing the deal in the opposite direction so far as to be just as unbalanced and therefore veto worthy.

[Bazz]

No veto. Not even marginally close. Why would it be? What is T.Jost? You nor anyone can answer that. This deal is fine.

I can answer that, he’s a 13 minute per game player with upside. If we are playing that game does schmaltz push 70 is arvidsson the Marchand?

[GavinC]

Out of curiosity, are you the commissioner charged with possibly vetoing this trade, or a concerned third party?

[chuckcouples]

Let me fix this for you.

I can answer that, he’s a 19 year old 13 minute per game player with 6 points in his last 10 games and star upside. If we are playing that game does schmaltz push 70 is arvidsson the Marchand?