Rank these prospects

[prospector77]

In a semi-keeper salary cap league that is multi-cat (G, A, Pts, PIM, SOG, STP, Hits, Blk, Tk, GWG, Wins). Keeper slots are two C, two RW, two LW, three D, 1 Goalie and 2 additional slots to be used as you wish.

Have been really struggling to rank my prospects and fill my remaining two keeper slots. I can keep only TWO of the following:

- Charlie Coyle (not a 'prospect' per-say, but he is in the discussion for one of my two remaining keeper slots)
- Adrian Kempe
- Daniel Sprong
- Alex Tuch
- Brendan Perlini

Dobber currently has these guys ranked pretty close together in top 300 keepers (Kempe = 224, Sprong = 265, Tuch = 196, Perlini = 221), as well as top prospect forwards (Kempe = 25, Sprong = 30, and Tuch = 9, Perlini = 22). Would I be better off keeping two of these guys and dropping Coyle?

[Martin5150]

Tuch, Sprong, Perlini, Coyle, Kempe.

I would drop Coyle. I really like Perlini long term value. But he's more of a power player and they are hit and miss more so than natural scorers and he's gonna be a hard guy to own early on. Sprong has hokes in his game, but between his skill and his team, he's a must keep guy.

[Belexus75]

Tuch, Sprong, Perlini, Coyle, Kempe.

I would drop Coyle. I really like Perlini long term value. But he's more of a power player and they are hit and miss more so than natural scorers and he's gonna be a hard guy to own early on. Sprong has hokes in his game, but between his skill and his team, he's a must keep guy.

i have same list but in reverse order lol...

[Martin5150]

That's awkward. I can not see Kempe as a top 6 forward longterm. He's a 3rd liner to me. Coyle has been around long enough and not broken out. He stil, may, as I've always though bigger more physical players have a slower curve. But at this point, I have extreme doubts.