Reply With QuoteIf it is time for Rangers to rebuild then move makes some sense, gives Lundy an oppotunity to go to a contending team.
Does Lundqvist to the Blues make sense
Sure, the Rags don't play D in front of him but they are years away from being competitive again with no young help on the horizon. Does asking The King to waive his no-trade to St. Louis for their wealth of young players...rebuild the D starting with Schmaltz....make sense?
Re: Does Lundqvist to the Blues make sense
If it is time for Rangers to rebuild then move makes some sense, gives Lundy an oppotunity to go to a contending team.
Piranha Hockey League est 1990 - Oakley Doakley's - 16 teams
Pts only W=2 OL=1 SO=3 Auction Draft
WHL - est 2016 Expansion - Glasgow Kiss - 24 teams
25 pro players / 10 minor league players
G,A,+/-,PPP,SOG,Hits,Blk,PIM,FOW, W,Sv,GA,SHO
Re: Does Lundqvist to the Blues make sense
It doesn't, just because of contracts, and the fact that the Rangers have no one to take over for the next 2-3 years until a young goalie is ready to fill the void.
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)
Re: Does Lundqvist to the Blues make sense
Hutton has been lights out and Allen can only play better, plus they just got Schwartz back which will be a major boost.
When the Blues inevitably make a move it will be for a top 6 forward. I think they still need a top C to be a serious cup threat but with the abundance of W available this deadline that might be the more likely route.
I don't see the rangers trading Lundqvist either. He's too important to them on and off the ice, they'd never get anything good enough in return to justify trading him.
I do not think this makes sense at all for either team.
Re: Does Lundqvist to the Blues make sense
No, becuase I don't really the the Blues needing a goalie.
I think they could deal him offseason if they can get a replacement in free agency or via trade, not necessarily in the same trade.
Want a Signature? Go to Settings, and you'll find Edit Signature down the list on the left.
Re: Does Lundqvist to the Blues make sense
Also, last time the Blues tried to make a trade for an elite goalie on the downswing it hurt the team more than it helped (Miller).
12 Team, H2H, Keep 6 (in Bold)
G, A, Pts, PPP, FW, SOG, Hits, Blocks
W, Saves, S%, GAA, Game Started
2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 1Util, 2G, 5BN, 2IR, 1IR+, 1NA
C: Horvat, Trocheck
LW: J. Robertson, Byfield (C), Guenther
RW: Pavelski (C), Giroux (C), Svechnikov (LW)
D: Fox, Makar, Bouchard, Morrissey, Gudas
Util: Meier (LW, RW)
G: Oettinger, Georgiev, Samsonov, Woll
Re: Does Lundqvist to the Blues make sense
Don't forget about Marty!! Although it's very easy toOriginally Posted by 2014olympicgold
And no...I think if anything Lundqvist goes somewhere else.
Re: Does Lundqvist to the Blues make sense
It’s a shame to watch him wasting away on that team as currently constituted.
Re: Does Lundqvist to the Blues make sense
When did this turn into a Price thread?
Posting Permissions
