Reply With QuoteI take Pasta here. Mack could very well breakout, but that breakout would be what Pastrnak has already done.
Take the guy thats already hit 70 (I am a Mack owner myself). I also think the term generational is thrown around too willy nilly sometimes.
David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
Pts only (G=1, A=1) Pastrnak or Mackinnon. I'd be getting Mackinnon back. Anybody here still consider Mackinnon generational?
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
I take Pasta here. Mack could very well breakout, but that breakout would be what Pastrnak has already done.
Take the guy thats already hit 70 (I am a Mack owner myself). I also think the term generational is thrown around too willy nilly sometimes.
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
I have no issue with the trade but Im not sure I ever recall anyone saying MacKinnon was generational.Originally Posted by Rocky71
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
I prefer Pasta period.
Follow me on twitter: @doylelb4
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
i would say for next year or 2 i rather have Pasta, after that Mackinnon could come close maybe even have few more points. it will really all depends on what colorado does as a team. So i would say Pasta is safer pick
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
Pasta for me also. Who knows what's going to happen with Avs.
12 team, H2H points, limited keepers
allowed 6 keeper players(PLAYER DRAFTED IN RDS 1-8 NOT ABLE TO BE KEEPER)
Daily starts
16 man roster plus 1 IR
start 6 forwards,4 d, 2 goalies
pts: G=3, A=2, DA=3, DG=5, +/-=1 GWG=1, OTG=2, OTA=1, PPG=2, PPA=1, SHG=3, SHA=1, HT=3, SHOOTOUT GOAL=1
BLKS=.25, HITS=.25, MAJ=2
Goalie pts: WINS=5, SAVES=.20, GA=-1, SO=3
SHOG SAVE=.50, SHOL=2
forwards: M.TKACHUK(k),MARCHAND(k),SCHEIFELE(k)
BENN, GAUDREAU*, COUTURIER*
d: M.RIELLY(k), JOSI*, MCAVOY*, ELLIS
goalies :TALBOT* DEMKO MAF
(k)=keeper
*= no keeper eligibility
bencH: KOPITAR* R. GRAVES ROBERTSON KREJCI
IR E.PETTERSSON(k)
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
And the "Generational" wore is dropped again. No... Mack is not
Generational like Crosby, McDavid or Matthews.
I earnestly waiting for the Mack break out but like others have said...that could be on par with Pasta.
I go Pasta here.
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
Pasta is better, but less so than if goals were at a premium.
DobberHockey Senior Writer (columnist since 2012)
Click here to read my weekly "Roos Lets Loose" columns, going live every Wednesday morning and consisting of a rotating schedule of a "forum buzz" column, a fantasy hockey mailbag, a tournament/poll, and an edition of Goldipucks and the Three Skaters: https://dobberhockey.com/category/ho...key-rick-roos/
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
And the "Generational" wore is dropped again. No... Mack is not
Generational like Crosby, McDavid or Matthews..
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
So many of Pasta's goals were on breakaways or other slick moves. He has the skill to get the job done, plain and simple.
Mac may be as well but he is surrounded in question marks, and you already know you have a 70pt 30goal scorer in Pasta.
Not to mention goals being generally harder to come by and Mac has never gotten near what Pasta has already achieved.
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
Pastrnak is the safer guy. Mackinnon will be good but not generational. Pastrnak is the choice here!
Yahoo:16 team h2h (18 man rosters) 4keepers per team
player cats:G,A,+/-ppp,shp,sog,gwg,hits,blks :goalie cats:W,gaa,sv%,so
3c-Zibanejad, Getzlaf, Trochek
6w-Fiala, JT Miller,Pastrnak, Pearson, kapanen, Lindblom
4d-Hamilton,Provorov, R.Andersson, Doughty
2g-Markstrom, Blackwood
bench-Schultz, McCann, Lowry
IR:Kucherov, Beauvilier
Fantrax:Nordiques 9 team dynasty pts only (max roster:50)
notables:Stamkos, Seguin, Kuznetsov, E.Lindholm, Debrincat, Wheeler, Marchand, PLD, Kessel, Meier, Tuch, Hedman, Suter, Chabot, Bobrovsky ,Hellebuyck, Binnington
notable prospects:Turcotte, Zegras, N.Suzuki, Farabee, Denisenko, Krebs, N.Robertson, Jokiharju, Shestyorkin
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
I think MacKinnon's potential is wasted in Avs (meaning he probably will never get to have the points output he could have elswhere), while Pastrnak's role with the Bruins is insured the short-long term (unless that contrat situation goes sour), I would go Pastrnak for sure there.
10-team Pts only, 19-man roster, 9F, 4D, 2G, 4bench 95M cap league
F: T.Tompson Pasta Kaprizov Rantanen Gaudreau Necas Greig Zegras Vilardi
D: Josi Bouchard Sandin Sanheim
G Shesterkin Samsonov
B: Woll Perfetti Poitras
Farm: Guenther, Will Smith
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
Pastrnak for me; Mackinnon is a great hockey player but plays for the worst team in the league
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
Pasta full stop
Pool #1: 10 Team Keeper League,
Points only, 12F, 6D, 2G
Protection: Any 22 + 2 prospects
Result 19/20: 3rd
F: Stamkos, Tavares, Matthews, Marner, Hall, Bergeron, Gusev, Kopitar, W. Karlsson, Marschessault, B. Schenn, R. Smith, Mantha, Kubalik, Kaprizov
D: Rielly, Krug, E. Karlsson, S. Jones, D. Toews, Giordano, Severson, Dobson
P: Podkholzin, Holtz, N. Robertson, Lundell, Lehtonen, Perunovich
G (W2, OTL1, SO3, G, A): Hellebuyck, Bobrovsky, Mrazek, Talbot
Pools #2 & 3: 31 team head to head dynasty leagues: full NHL replica where roster + farm =90 - fast becoming an expert in the MHL
Pool #4: Dobber Campbell Pro 2020
Re: David Pastrnak vs Nathan Mackinnon Pts only
I'd prefer Pastrnak. He has shown he is capable of scoring 70 pts and is only 21 years old and paired with Brad Marchand. MacKinnon has the skill but not the linemates at the moment.
Posting Permissions