Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Roo & Lundy too much for Stamkos ?

  1. #1
    Grapes's Avatar
    Grapes is offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,548
    Location
    Sunny Okanagan
    Rep Power
    38

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Roo & Lundy too much for Stamkos ?

    It may take Giroux and Lundqvist to land Stamkos. I could ask for Schneider or Bob to be included.
    Is that too much ?
    I tried Backstrom & Quick for Stamkos just before our draft but he is not high on Backstrom.
    I was then able to flip Quick for Lundy.


    Roo & Lundy for Stammer & Bob or Schneider....thoughts ?
    Yahoo! 10 Team Keep 6, H2H - 1 win
    G, A, SOG, PPP, FOW, H, B, Wins, GAA, Sv%, SHO
    4 weekly goalie appearances minimum
    2C, 2RW, 2LW, 1Ut, 4D, 3G, 6Bench, 2-I/R+, 1NA

    C: Bennett
    LW: E.Kane, Kaprizov
    LW/C: Draisaitl, Stutzle
    RW: Marner
    RW/C: T.Thompson, Necas
    RW/LW: Svechnikov
    D: Dahlin, Bouchard, Sergachev, Gudas
    G: Vasilevskiy , Skinner, Gustavsson



    When I say nothing, I say everything. J.White

  2. #2
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Deity

    Default Re: Roo & Lundy too much for Stamkos ?

    I think the deal would be a push.

    Giroux </= Stamkos (damn it's close but looking at the cats, I give a slight edge to Stammer)

    Lundqvist > Bobrovsky (he would be who I would want) but again, this one is close too
    10 Team, Points Only, Cash League

    25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
    Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
    Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt

    Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink

    G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger


    "Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."

  3. #3
    Location
    Prairies
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Demi-God

    Default Re: Roo & Lundy too much for Stamkos ?

    I have to ask... because Blayze loves to call him Roo as well.
    Is that a thing?
    Like... do broadcasters or news reporters call him that?

    I thought his nickname was "G", but here on the forums, I see way more people nicknaming him as "Roo" rather than "G"?
    ???

  4. #4
    JimmyMac's Avatar
    JimmyMac is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    287
    Rep Power
    15

    Dobber Sports Blue-Chipper

    Default Re: Roo & Lundy too much for Stamkos ?

    too much, imo. unless you've got a huge premium on goals. lundy is about as consistent as it gets in net.

  5. #5
    Location
    Dryden, Ontario.
    Rep Power
    40

    Administrator

    Default Re: Roo & Lundy too much for Stamkos ?

    I'm only doing that deal if Bobrovsky is coming back as well but this feels like a bit too much of an overpay.
    Follow me on Twitter@SteveLaidlaw

    https://image.ibb.co/k3o8Sa/dobber_banner_sig.jpg

  6. #6
    Grapes's Avatar
    Grapes is offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,548
    Location
    Sunny Okanagan
    Rep Power
    38

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Re: Roo & Lundy too much for Stamkos ?

    Thank you. I was thinking it was a bit much. I like my combo of Rask, Lundy in goal.

    I heard Roo on these boards and it has stuck with me.
    Yahoo! 10 Team Keep 6, H2H - 1 win
    G, A, SOG, PPP, FOW, H, B, Wins, GAA, Sv%, SHO
    4 weekly goalie appearances minimum
    2C, 2RW, 2LW, 1Ut, 4D, 3G, 6Bench, 2-I/R+, 1NA

    C: Bennett
    LW: E.Kane, Kaprizov
    LW/C: Draisaitl, Stutzle
    RW: Marner
    RW/C: T.Thompson, Necas
    RW/LW: Svechnikov
    D: Dahlin, Bouchard, Sergachev, Gudas
    G: Vasilevskiy , Skinner, Gustavsson



    When I say nothing, I say everything. J.White

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •