Good points. Not what i was hoping to hear, but I appreciate it none the less.Gilbert has always played a lot of minutes. He's one of those players that we always expect more offense from but, the fact is, he's only scored 33 goals in over 400 NHL games. Over his career he has averaged 33 points per 82 games. If we take away his 45-point year, (0.55 PPG) which seems like an anomaly now, he averages 30 points per 82 games. I think 30-33 points is the high point for Gilbert. He's getting great mileage out of one 45-point season. Gilbert was tied for 16th among Dmen in 08-09.
Here are the scoring stats for defensemen in 2008-09:
http://espn.go.com/nhl/statistics/pl...ion/defensemen
Even Cam Barker had 40 points in 08-09!
Here are the scoring stats for defensemen in 2011-12:
http://espn.go.com/nhl/statistics/pl...ion/defensemen
If Gilbert had matched his career rate of 33 points last season he would have been tied for 31st in scoring for defensemen. There are some quality offensive defensemen that didn't get 45 points last season. I think it would be more accurate in assessing Tom Gilbert's potential if the 45-point season was ignored.
Gilbert does many things well, but nothing he does really stands out. He's not a PPQB and, with Ryan Whitney's (<<<sleeper) injury problems, has had plenty of opportunity to assume the role. I've watched him play with the Oilers quite a bit and he just doesn't look like one of those guys who likes having the puck. He's the opposite of poised.
Also, Gilbert will turn 30 before the NHL All-Star game...not exactly old, but not an age to expect a big increase in production.
As for Minnesota's other options...call me crazy but I think Nate Prosser has the potential to surprise offensively.
I like Prosser too