Dobber Guide 2011-12

[mister_mcgoo]

Dobber not sure if you want to have all the issues listed in one big thread or separate out the Prospects Guide into its own thread but one thing I noticed off the bat was that Winnipeg appears after Anaheim in the Prospects Guide (I assume because they used to be Atlanta)

[TheRook]

That's what I was coming here to say too. Made me laugh!

now i just have to convince mcgoo that dobber is right and he should swap me bryz for leighton.

[Shoeless]

The xlsx version should be okay, as I did it with the playoff one. But will look into that as well. The Draft list is not available right now anyway

Do me a favor and send me a special draft list with xls - it's a long story.

Matt Carle going to finally breakout?

[mister_mcgoo]

I'm really enjoying the guide so far, almost too much...I was reading it on my phone on the subway on the way home from work today and almost missed my stop and ended up in the Bronx

[mister_mcgoo]

Under San Jose the note that starts:

I get the feeling that with that trade for Burns

is no longer valid, time to rethink that thought Dobber

[Dobber]

Dobber not sure if you want to have all the issues listed in one big thread or separate out the Prospects Guide into its own thread but one thing I noticed off the bat was that Winnipeg appears after Anaheim in the Prospects Guide (I assume because they used to be Atlanta)

When it was released, we didn't know for sure if they were moving - only last minute

[Dobber]

Do me a favor and send me a special draft list with xls - it's a long story.

Matt Carle going to finally breakout?

I think he hinted at it last year, he's getting to the right age.

I'll go with xls, I'm sold

[Dobber]

Under San Jose the note that starts:

I get the feeling that with that trade for Burns

is no longer valid, time to rethink that thought Dobber

Done. Do you think this warrants a blue highlight? Or just leave it as I fix these little typos.

[Dobber]

I'm really enjoying the guide so far, almost too much...I was reading it on my phone on the subway on the way home from work today and almost missed my stop and ended up in the Bronx

haha - another guy tweeted to me that he stubbed his toe running upstairs for his laptop

[mister_mcgoo]

Done. Do you think this warrants a blue highlight? Or just leave it as I fix these little typos.

naw wouldn't worry about the blue since it JUST happened, thanks Dobber

[mister_mcgoo]

I found another error Dobber...you seem to have Hemsky listed as playing 70 games this coming season, that can't be right can it?

[mister_mcgoo]

under Jersey:

but I don’t DeBoer will loosen the reins.

"I doubt"? or maybe "I don't think"?

[Dobber]

under Jersey:



"I doubt"? or maybe "I don't think"?

All the corrections are fixed except this one, this one will be next update

[sakic19]

Not a big error but I'll still post it, why not?

Angus Prime Cut: Wojtek Wolski Grade: Sirloin

It’s hard to imagine that this may be the last shot in an NHL scoring role for the 25-year-old Wolski. After putting up 50 points in his rookie season of 2006-07, Wolski has only broken the mark once (65 points combined between Colorado and Phoenix in 2010-11).

End of statement should say 2009-2010 and not 2010-2011.

[Pengwin7]

Note about Richards/Eriksson in the Dallas section:
Eriksson was on the ice for 59 of Brad Richards’ 77 points (76.6%). Richards was on the ice for 53 of Eriksson’s 71 points (74.6%). In other words, even though the difference was slight, Richards needed Eriksson more than Eriksson needed Richards.

Two items:
1. Eriksson had 73pts in 2010-2011.
2. In fairness (to include injury) you need to remove any of Eriksson's production in which Brad Richards did not play. That is an 8pt* in 10game stretch from Feb.14th - March 8th.
B.Richards on for 53 of Eriksson's 65pts* would be 81.5%.

As a comparison:
Daniel Sedin missed a big chunk of time in 2009-2010.
Henrik was probably on for 90% of Daniel's points.
But due to injury, Daniel may have only been on for 60% of Henrik's points.
This circumstance would skew an interpretation of "who needs who".

*Take injury games into account - both ways.