View Poll Results: Which Side?

Voters
16. You may not vote on this poll
  • Zach Parise

    12 75.00%
  • Patrick Kane

    4 25.00%
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Parise for Kane

  1. #1
    Rep Power
    0

    Dobber Sports Prodigy

    Default Parise for Kane

    I own Parise and have been thinking about landing a RW stud in exchange for him.

    The owner of Patrick Kane also owns Corey Perry. So I thought I would approach him to see if he would trade me Perry for Parise. a top LW for a top RW. He countered with Perry for Parise + Halak. Soooo it doesn't look like I'll be landing Perry.

    It DOES sound like he might go for a Zach Parise for Patrick Kane swap.

    What do you guys think about that?

    LW is tough to fill out and I already traded away Kovalchuk early last season for Chris Stewart and Hossa to help my RW but is Stewart enough help? is Hossa durable enough to rely on?

    I'm close to landing Bobby Ryan - which would help ease the blow of losing Parise.

    But my biggest question is

    Parise VS Kane

    which side?
    and if he wants more for Kane - how much?
    14 team Keeper Points only - limited starting roster moves
    Start: 3C, 3LW, 3RW, 4D, 3G
    C: Vilardi, Dvorak, Karlsson
    LW: Vrana, Hertl, Mangiapane
    RW: Kubalik, Point, Tuch
    D: Ty Smith, Hughes, Burns, Hronek
    G: Shesterkin, Varlamov, Vanacek
    BENCH
    Kakko, Turcotte, Sharangovich, Vilardi, Beckman, Perfetti, Lysell, Sillinger, McTavish
    Drysdale, Perunovich, R.Merkley, Fagemo
    Dostal

  2. #2
    Location
    Siem Reap, Cambod
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Demi-God

    Default

    I would rather have Parise. But my answer might change depending on what your are giving up for Ryan.

    Do you see these as unrelated events?
    Last edited by Shoeless; July 21, 2011 at 6:29 AM.

  3. #3
    Killer67's Avatar
    Killer67 is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,519
    Location
    Ottawa
    Rep Power
    29

    Dobber Sports All-Star

    Default

    I certainly wouldn't be adding to Parise to land Kane. If you can try adding Anderson/Pavelec to the Parise for Perry package, I may do that but even then, I don't think you should be depleting your LW for it.

    I'd put Parise on the block and see what offers you get in, it may even scare the other guy into changing his offer back.
    10 Team Yahoo H2H - Keep 5 - G,A,+/-,PPP,PIMS,HITS SOG,GWG/W,GAA,SV%,SO
    C: Tavares, Pavelski, Fabbri, Matthews, Rakell,
    LW: Landeskog, Sedin, Perron
    RW: Kucherov, Oshie, Radulov, Backes
    D: Subban, Petry, Gostisbehere, Green, Yandle, Werenski
    G: Price, Talbot


    Canadian Dad Blog - http://canadiandad.com

  4. #4
    Rep Power
    0

    Dobber Sports Prodigy

    Default

    I'm working on landing Ryan for Craig Anderson (it might take Pavelec instead of Anderson). The Ryan owner really needs a G.

    I drafted Parise 9th overall 2 years ago in our inaugural draft for this keeper league so I am high on him - planned on building around him. And I don't really want to bolster my RW by gutting my LW. Although a Ryan pick-up would help offset a Parise move so it's a tough call. Plus if Parise ends up stuck in NJ on a separate line than Kovalchuk it could hurt both their numbers. plus coming back from a season ending injury is always a concern.

    @Killer67 - putting Parise on the block idea does sound like a good idea too. even just for bargaining purposes.

    SIDE NOTE:
    I do have #2 and #5 picks in this years draft where I should be able to grab an elite goalie: one of Bryz,Ward,Price,Niemi,Howard,Miller and a decent RW; at least Pavelski,Backes,Hemsky, maybe Iginla,Gaborik, - Partly why I'm moving a G.
    14 team Keeper Points only - limited starting roster moves
    Start: 3C, 3LW, 3RW, 4D, 3G
    C: Vilardi, Dvorak, Karlsson
    LW: Vrana, Hertl, Mangiapane
    RW: Kubalik, Point, Tuch
    D: Ty Smith, Hughes, Burns, Hronek
    G: Shesterkin, Varlamov, Vanacek
    BENCH
    Kakko, Turcotte, Sharangovich, Vilardi, Beckman, Perfetti, Lysell, Sillinger, McTavish
    Drysdale, Perunovich, R.Merkley, Fagemo
    Dostal

  5. #5
    bondon's Avatar
    bondon is offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    15,919
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Ninja

    Default

    If you can get Bobby Ryan for either Pavs or Anderson that would be an amazing deal. Quite honestly to me this is the deal you were waiting for (I remember your previous thread). Much rather trade Anderson or Pavs for Ryan than trade Lundqvist for Malkin.

    I like Killer's idea of putting Parise up on the block. Try to spook the other guy to at least throw in a mid-round pick or something like that. I really don't like the idea of trading Parise straight up for Kane, you should have some leverage here and to me doing it one for one would be conceding, but I don't think its outrageously far off quite honestly if it helps your balance.

    Also if you wanna look at it from an angle that would make you feel better about the decision:

    Pavelec (Or Anderson) + Parise --> B.Ryan + P.Kane

    You tell me which side you'd take
    Last edited by bondon; July 21, 2011 at 8:49 AM.
    Goalies: If I'm pickin em you best be sittin em!


  6. #6
    JHM's Avatar
    JHM is offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,296
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Rep Power
    33

    Dobber Sports Genius

    Default

    Kane because
    - four years young (300+ more career points remaining)
    - rarer RW (in my pools there are far fewer ELITE RW, or ELITE RW with issues)
    - higher upside

    It's the perfect time to acquire Kane, as last season was quite average for him.

  7. #7
    STONE.'s Avatar
    STONE. is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,539
    Location
    GR
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Guru

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CloakandSwagger View Post
    Plus if Parise ends up stuck in NJ on a separate line than Kovalchuk it could hurt both their numbers.

    I wouldn't worry too much about this. Both guys will play PP, and they'll simply take pressure off one another on separate lines. Crosby and Malkin both are able to put up points on separate lines. Sakic and Forsberg used to do alright.
    Points-only, Full Keeper Dynasty League
    Active roster (no starts, just total points): 12 FW, 6 D, 1 Goalie

    Forwards: Kucherov, Barkov, Teravainen, Seguin, Hoffman, Lindholm, Gusev, Horvat, Meier, Perron, Schwartz, Johansen, Pavelski, Buchnevich, Hischier, Granlund, Bracco

    Defense: Josi, Dahlin, Letang, Gostisbehere, Ekman-Larsson, Petry, Slavin, Keith, Matheson

    Goal: Lehner, Holtby, Varlamov

    Farm: Soderstrom, York, Woo, Tracey, Dorofeyev

  8. #8
    Shake's Avatar
    Shake is offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    10,652
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Monster

    Default

    Have you guys seen Kane this off season? He's been a machine in the gym this off season. His wrist issue wont be much of a problem.

    Not saying it sways a decision on OP's question. Just more of a comment, but he's in great shape and a huge year is coming.

  9. #9
    Rep Power
    0

    Dobber Sports Prodigy

    Default

    Thanks for the replies guys - a lot to think over.

    @B0ndon - I agree. These moves definitely feel better than that Lundquist/Malkin deal.

    this morning he offered me

    Corey Perry + Christian Ehrhoff
    FOR
    Zach Parise + Jaro Halak

    I think that's a pretty big overpay on my part and Declined - but that made it clear that he'll be quicker to part with Kane rather Perry.

    he needs a G bad so I told him that I'd put two offers together for Kane a G + LW and a G + RW offer. He sounded interested.

    I'm thinking of sending him these packages for Kane:
    Craig Anderson + Tyler Ennis (C/LW) FOR Patrick Kane
    OR
    Ondrej Pavelec + Ryan Callahan (RW) FOR Patrick Kane

    he already owns Robin Lehner which might push him to take Anderson+Ennis. And that duo probably has the higher upside. if he takes Anderson+Ennis then I could still make the move to flip Pavelec for Ryan and keep Parise all the same. * I will be drafting a top G to fill out my 3 Goalie spots *

    I am high on Ennis but he's no Patrick Kane.

    Ennis and Callahan are also 'Prospect Protected' so he wouldn't have to use one of his Keeper spots on them - essentially giving him an extra keeper spot.

    thoughts on the counter offer packages? is it overpaying? it might not be enough to get it done but for a TOP RW i feel it's probably worth a shot.
    Last edited by CloakandSwagger; July 21, 2011 at 9:05 PM.
    14 team Keeper Points only - limited starting roster moves
    Start: 3C, 3LW, 3RW, 4D, 3G
    C: Vilardi, Dvorak, Karlsson
    LW: Vrana, Hertl, Mangiapane
    RW: Kubalik, Point, Tuch
    D: Ty Smith, Hughes, Burns, Hronek
    G: Shesterkin, Varlamov, Vanacek
    BENCH
    Kakko, Turcotte, Sharangovich, Vilardi, Beckman, Perfetti, Lysell, Sillinger, McTavish
    Drysdale, Perunovich, R.Merkley, Fagemo
    Dostal

  10. #10
    JagrBomb's Avatar
    JagrBomb is offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    11,675
    Location
    toronto and ottaw
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Juggernaut

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JHM View Post
    Kane because
    - four years young (300+ more career points remaining)
    - rarer RW (in my pools there are far fewer ELITE RW, or ELITE RW with issues)
    - higher upside

    It's the perfect time to acquire Kane, as last season was quite average for him.
    -age isnt really an issue here, they are both pretty young
    -LW/RW arguement will fluxuate every year, with positional eligibilities and new players breaking out etc.
    - i'd say parise has the higher upside. ive never been a huge believer in kane, i dont think he'll ever be able to top 90 points.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •