Luongo, Ward, Halak or Lindback?

[jake_canucks]

One year league, 2 pts for win, 1 for a shutout.

I have all 4 of Luongo, Ward, Halak and Lindback, I am looking to package one of them in order to improve my offense as we only start 2 per night, who should I deal?

[Essej]

I think Halak can probably fetch the greatest return, so I guess I'd be most inclined to drop him. If all returns are equal I would definitely lose Lindback, as he's the clear cut worst of your 4 options.

[khiyasu]

Originally Posted by jake_canucks

One year league, 2 pts for win, 1 for a shutout.

I have all 4 of Luongo, Ward, Halak and Lindback, I am looking to package one of them in order to improve my offense as we only start 2 per night, who should I deal?

Try trading Luongo to a Schneider owner. But after todays game, that's gonna be a tougher sell.

Out of those goalies I would let Lindback go

[LawMan]

In your league scoring (no periperhals) I'd rank them:

Halak-Elliott has played his way out of a timeshare and Halak will get the bulk of the starts on a very good team. Most wins and most shutouts.

GAP

Lindback- (14 of 18 starts) He will let in lots of goals but has the Tampa Bay offence to win him some games.
Luongo- (9 of 18 starts) had one terrible game but has otherwise been spectacular. Has Schneider breathing down his neck but should keep 50% of the starts on a very good team.
Ward- (12 of 17 starts) Has struggled but the team is actually leading the division. Although Ellis has stolen more starts then expected he should get the bulk of the starts going forward.

I think Halak is the clear #1 here with Lindback, Luongo and Ward being very close in value in your league (wins +shutouts). However Luongo has the most name value, followed by Ward (Lindback's starts LOOK really bad). Therfore I'd try and trade Luongo, hype his great numbers and how he's the "starter" in Vancouver try and get another GM to overlook the fact he's in a timeshare and was a backup a month ago, or play on the Schneider owners frustration thus far.

[jake_canucks]

Would you guys do a deal like this?

Keep in mind it's 1 pt per goal/assist and 2 pts per win, 1 per shutout

Luongo + Pominville/Semin
for
Perry

Who would you deal, pommer or semin?

Perry owner also has Schneids

[LawMan]

Originally Posted by jake_canucks

Would you guys do a deal like this?

Keep in mind it's 1 pt per goal/assist and 2 pts per win, 1 per shutout

Luongo + Pominville/Semin
for
Perry

Who would you deal, pommer or semin?

Perry owner also has Schneids

I like the idea (trade Luo to Schneider owner get Perry back). Who is available off the waiver wire to fill the empty roster spot? If you can get a solid skater off the wire I like the deal as a sell high on Luongo/Pominville and buy low on Perry. Also it allows you to stop wasting points by having 2 goalies on your bench each night. I'd keep Semin over Pominville he's got more talent and Vanek has cooled off, Pominville got most of his points riding Vanek's coattails.

If you can get a solid skater (>.5ppg) player off the wire or in return I'd pull the trigger.

[jake_canucks]

Well the reason that I'm doing this deal is because I currently have Nash on IR and so when he returns I will add him, so really it's Nash + Perry for Luongo + Pominville

[LawMan]

Originally Posted by jake_canucks

Well the reason that I'm doing this deal is because I currently have Nash on IR and so when he returns I will add him, so really it's Nash + Perry for Luongo + Pominville

Yeah I like that deal for you. Good use of the 2-for-1 to add a roster spot for Nash's return.