|
|
|
#1
02-24-2013, 12:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Would you give Lupul or Brunner?
In some trade talks the other manager gave me the choice between giving Lupul or giving Brunner. I'd basically get future considerations back, so no other roster players are involved.
I'm torn: Lupul has proven more and contributes in more cats (see league settings in signature), but he's injury prone and 3 years older. Brunner has looked good and scored a goal in nearly every other game, but he doesn't offer much in the peripherals. And his ice time has been a bit on the decline. Who would you part ways with and WHY? Thanks!
__________________
12 team H2H dynasty G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, SOG, FW, HIT W, GAA, SV*, SV%, SHO C,C,C,LW,LW,RW,RW,W,D,D,D,D,Util,Util,4xBN,2xInf Team: C: Stamkos, Tavares, Kopitar, Hanzal, Legwand C/RW: Backes, Pavelski LW: Lucic, Landeskog LW/RW: Lupul RW: Clarkson, Hornqvist RW/D: Byfuglien, Burns D: Letang, Streit G: Smith, Bryzgalov, Hiller, Fasth IR: Kovalchuk Farm: S.Bärtschi, M.Foligno, E.Kuznetsov, J.Morrow, N.Niederreiter, T.Tatar 
|
|
#2
02-24-2013, 12:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lupul is the easy choice here IMO. Brunner has had a hot start but it's just that - a hot start and a small sample size. We don't know about his durability either.
__________________
UHL Calgary Flames 24-team H2H (roto G, A, GWG, SHP, PPP, PIM, +/, SOG, Hits, Blks, FOW, W, SV, SV%, GAA, SO) Capped article archive Montreal Canadiens coverage Twitter:@DH_EricDaoust.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
