Fantasy Sports Forums - Dobber Sports  

Go Back   Fantasy Sports Forums - Dobber Sports > Fantasy Hockey Forum > One Year League - Trades/Player Talk
Login at DobberHockey

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2013, 09:10 AM
TheBeaker TheBeaker is offline
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 37
 
Rep Power: 0
TheBeaker is an unknown quantity at this point
Dobber Sports Sophomore
Default If i can convince him...

Does my Quick(or ward)/Tavares for any G/Fwd combination of his Crawford/Lundvist/Malkin/Neal make any sense?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2013, 09:15 AM
golfguy1672's Avatar
golfguy1672 golfguy1672 is online now
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 987
 
Location: Edmonton
Rep Power: 8
golfguy1672 is a jewel in the roughgolfguy1672 is a jewel in the roughgolfguy1672 is a jewel in the roughgolfguy1672 is a jewel in the roughgolfguy1672 is a jewel in the roughgolfguy1672 is a jewel in the rough
Dobber Sports Pro
Default

For me. Only if its Lundqvist. I'd deal Quick and Tavares for Lundqvist and Malkin/Neal
__________________
14 team Salary Cap league
NHL cap + 20 million
Scoring Cats - G, A, P, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, GWG, SOG
Goalie Cats - W, SV%, SO, GAA, SVS Made
Start - 3 C, RW, LW, F, 4 D, 2 UTIL, 2 G

C - Getzlaf, E Staal, Marleau, Elias, Eller
LW - Pacioretty, Vanek, Dubinsky, Raymond, Glencross
RW - Perry, Kane, Pominville, Simmonds, Clarkson, Stewart, Dupuis
D - Chara, Muzzin, Gardiner, Irwin
G - Lundqvist, Schneider, Biron
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2013, 09:22 AM
Gaborlick's Avatar
Gaborlick Gaborlick is online now
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,046
 
Location: Berkley, MI
Rep Power: 21
Gaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud ofGaborlick has much to be proud of
Dobber Sports Superstar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBeaker View Post
Does my Quick(or ward)/Tavares for any G/Fwd combination of his Crawford/Lundvist/Malkin/Neal make any sense?
I don't think you get Malkin in any deal here with the players involved. (if the GM is smart anyway)

Quick/Tavares for Lundy/Neal

Maybe send a pick his way as well.
__________________
10 Keepers (Finished 2nd, lose 1 keeper)
C: Malkin | Nugent-Hopkins
LW:Nash | Ryan
RW:Gaborik | Kessel | Voracek
D: Green
G: Miller
IR:
10 Team, 10 Keeper
Head to Head: G,A,P,PPP,SHP,BS,FW,GAA,SV%,SO
Daily changes: 3C, 3LW, 3RW, 4D, 1Util, 2G

Don't mistake opinion for fact.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2013, 09:24 AM
lucifer316's Avatar
lucifer316 lucifer316 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,963
 
Rep Power: 24
lucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond repute
Dobber Sports Genius
Default

in a 1 year league i dont see how you convince anyone to take quick for lundqvist

even if you are sending tavares and he is getting neal the production might not be enough to offset the positional eligibility of neal plus the difference between lundqvist and quick

you can try it but there is no way in hell i would even entertain your offer if i was the other guy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2013, 09:36 AM
TheBeaker TheBeaker is offline
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 37
 
Rep Power: 0
TheBeaker is an unknown quantity at this point
Dobber Sports Sophomore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer316 View Post
in a 1 year league i dont see how you convince anyone to take quick for lundqvist

even if you are sending tavares and he is getting neal the production might not be enough to offset the positional eligibility of neal plus the difference between lundqvist and quick

you can try it but there is no way in hell i would even entertain your offer if i was the other guy
I wouldn't either, but he's a funny guy. The points total for Tavares so far will be enticing to him.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2013, 09:41 AM
lucifer316's Avatar
lucifer316 lucifer316 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,963
 
Rep Power: 24
lucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond reputelucifer316 has a reputation beyond repute
Dobber Sports Genius
Default

looking at the points in your sig tavares has 66 malkin has 57 and neal 55

however lunqvist has 73.6 and quick has 43.4
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-22-2013, 10:52 AM
TheBeaker TheBeaker is offline
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 37
 
Rep Power: 0
TheBeaker is an unknown quantity at this point
Dobber Sports Sophomore
Default

True, I think the thing that breaks the deal is Andersons injury right now. Hes got Lunqvist, Anderson and Crawford so has plenty of juice in net. I also said he could have ward instead of he wanted though its not much of an upgrade there from quick. It's an idea, see if he counters.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-22-2013, 11:12 AM
AwesomeSince86's Avatar
AwesomeSince86 AwesomeSince86 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 278
 
Rep Power: 3
AwesomeSince86 will become famous soon enoughAwesomeSince86 will become famous soon enough
Dobber Sports Initiate
Default

For me, the only upgrade on Quick/Tavares would be Lundvquist/Malkin and the other owner would be crazy to take that deal.
__________________
10 Team Yahoo Daily H2H League
C, C, LW, LW, RW, RW, F, D, D, D, Util, G, G, BN, BN, BN, BN, IR
G, A, Pts, +/-, PIM, PPG, PPP, SHP, GWG, SOG, W, GA, SV, SV%, SHO
------------------------------------------------------
C: Tavares, H. Sedin, Backstrom, Benn
LW: Pacioretty, Lupul, Clowe
RW: Kessel, Eberle, Wheeler, Pavelski
D: Burns, Markov, Enstrom
G: Anderson, Niemi, Bobrovsky
IR: Spezza
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.