|
|
|
#1
02-11-2013, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Fleischmann/Enstrom for Eriksson/Burns
Which side wins in a 1 year league? I received the latter.
__________________
Team #1 Yahoo $$$ 15 Team Roto 48GP (1 Year) G A +/- PIM PPP SOG | W GAA SV% SHO 2C: E. Staal, Stastny(IR) 2L: Nash, Ryan, Eriksson 2R: Eberle, Burrows, Pavelski 4D: Bogosian, Burns, Kindl, Irwin, M.A. Bergeron 2G: Price, Varlamov, Halak(IR), J. Allen, Budaj 
|
|
#2
02-11-2013, 03:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
You definitely won on SOG and +/-, but I think the pts and PPP side of the trade are going to be closer than would have been expected before the season started. It all depends on whether Burns remains on the lowly Sharks PP2 unit. All the scoring power is on PP1 for SJ and I don't see Burns having nearly as much value this season if his PP minutes aren't promoted (16 of his 37 pts came on the PP last year). Fleichsmann is a poormans Eriksson, but I think you moved out whatever PPP and pts difference exists between them in Enstrom, unless the situation turns around for Burns.
__________________
1 yr league, 10 teams, H2H points: G(3), A(2), PPP(1), SHP (2), SOG (0.2), Hits (0.2), BKS (0.2), W(5), SV(0.2), GA(-1), SO(5) Roster set daily: 10 F, 6 D, 1 Util, 2 G, 3 BE, 1 IR Forwards: Tavares, Ovechkin, Ribeiro, Parise, Benn, E. Kane, Skinner, Brown, Backes, Steen, Tarasenko, Landeskog, O'Reilly, Saad Defense: Letang, Phaneuf, OEL, Streit, Carlson Goalies: Price, Rask, Kiprusoff, Emery
|
|
#3
02-11-2013, 04:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I take the side with the better forward, for me that's Eriksson, on top of that the difference between Enstrom and Burns is much less than the difference between Fleischmann and Eriksson. To me the easy choice is Eriksson and Burns, good deal for you.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
