|
|
|
#1
02-08-2013, 11:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Landeskog vs RNH
With my scoring cats, Landeskog would be the proper choice, correct?
(G,A,+/-,PIM,Hits)
__________________
13 Team Keeper - Hold 7 (1 G max) Scoring Cats: G,A,+/-,PIM,Hits,W,GAA,SV%,OTL Start 9F,5D,2G F:Perry,M.Richards,RNH,Thornton,Hossa,Kovalchuk,Pa cioretty,Oshie,Yakupov,Kesler, Huberdeau,Hanzal,M.Foligno D: Letang,Yandle,Bogosian,Burns,Hedman,Ellis,L.Schenn G: Fleury,Schneider 
|
|
#2
02-08-2013, 03:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Probably with those scoring cats. RNH is a point producer but will have very little PIMS and hits. +/- won't be that strong either until Edmonton as a whole gets better defensively.
__________________
16 Team Keeper League, Year Three Head to Head. Keep 8. Potential Future Keepers in Bold F (Start 6): Neal, Parise, Benn, P Kane, Simmonds, Lecavalier, Doan, Wheeler, Boyes D (Start 4): Pietrangelo, Campbell, J. Johnson, Leddy, Fowler, Faulk, Whitney G (Start 1): Lundqvist Point System G=2, A=1, DefenseG=+1, DefenseA=+1, GWG=1, OTG=1, PIM=0.5, PPG=1, PPA=1, PenaltyShotG=1, SHG=2, ShootOutG=1, Shot=0.1, +/-=1, Hat Trick=3 Goalie Points W=4, S= 0.14, GA=-1, OW=1, ShootOutW =1, SO=2
|
|
#3
02-08-2013, 04:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
G: Landeskog
A: RNH by quite a bit +/-: Pretty equal PIM: Landeskog Hits: Landeskog by a ton
|
|
#4
02-08-2013, 04:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
For me it depends on how much weight your categories carry, if all are equal, you may want to side towards Landeskog, but if points carry more weight, then I would rather go with RNH.
More times than not, I would prefer RNH.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
