Would like to add Hall. The G/M has him pegged @ 50 goals a season on a consisten basis.
He asked for either Neal or Rinne. I don't think Jordan Staal is enough and I feel Landeskog in our format might be an over payment. Thoughts ?
Yahoo! 10 Team Keep 6, H2H - 1 win
G, A, SOG, PPP, FOW, H, B, Wins, GAA, Sv%, SHO
4 weekly goalie appearances minimum
2C, 2RW, 2LW, 1Ut, 4D, 3G, 6Bench, 2-I/R+, 1NA
C: Bennett
LW: E.Kane, Kaprizov
LW/C: Draisaitl, Stutzle
RW: Marner
RW/C: T.Thompson, Necas
RW/LW: Svechnikov
D: Dahlin, Bouchard, Sergachev, Gudas
G: Vasilevskiy , Skinner, Gustavsson
When I say nothing, I say everything. J.White
yeah you got a little oiler thing going on there he is going to use that to his advantage to try to squeeze you
you are going to either overpay or you arent going to get him
your roster kinda shows your hand so to speak
You don't need Hall, you have enough Oilers on your roster. With such a small roster you get too many players on 1 team a bad week could cost you. Even though I think Hall will be a 50 goal scorer, Neal is no slouch and he wioll play with Sid or Geno for the next ? years and Landeskog is going to be a stud so no use over paying. If Hall excels, it is going to be either with RNH or Yaks or both so you can't really lose.
Therefor don't overpay
Piranha Hockey League est 1990 - Oakley Doakley's - 16 teams
Pts only W=2 OL=1 SO=3 Auction Draft
WHL - est 2016 Expansion - Glasgow Kiss - 24 teams
25 pro players / 10 minor league players
G,A,+/-,PPP,SOG,Hits,Blk,PIM,FOW, W,Sv,GA,SHO