Landeskog for Gallagher and Trouba

[SemOner]

Me sending out Landeskog and getting Gallagher and Trouba in return

I am considering this offer. I am pretty weak at LW and losing Landy would further dig that hole, but I think its good value and selling high on his decent start.

[Pengwin7]

I think Trouba alone is a good return on Landeskog.
Trouba is an excellent player to own in HIT/BLK leagues - especially because you basically have to get majority of BLK from D-men.
[In fairness, Trouba is off to an absolutely BRUTAL start this year.]

He might even squeak his way onto your Keep7 (Tavares, MacKinnon, W.Nylander, Hamilton, Murray, Vas.... #7. He's very close with Provorov, I think... a decision you make down the road.)

I think you should make this deal.

[SemOner]

thanks. i agree fully. one issue i have is finding a roster spot for the extra guy. this may be a question i already know the answer to, which is, is it worth keeping a guy like Puljujarvi taking up a roster spot? probably not hey. same issue with D. Strome who was an inherited keeper

[Pengwin7]

I would drop Dylan Strome outright.
He's not a consideration in a one-year league or a keep 7.

[SemOner]

thanks very much.

[Hunter9]

Agree, take this. Drop Strome, no value to you right now.

[SemOner]

Agreed. I accepted the trade and waiting for league approval.

Was offered Nemeth, Dubinsky, and Nash for Landeskog after. But the Trouba deal is obviously better hey?

[lucafen4]

yes, it is... Trouba's an emerging beast. I don't think you'll find a significant difference in his stat line than Ristolainen this year. They should both be around 45pts with great peripherals. this is a steal. the other offer is two fading players and an early season surprise - Trouba deal is by far... miles... actually a better offer