Reply With QuoteLack 10%
Condon 25%
^My odds
Lack or Condon
Do you think either of these backup goalies can ever be regular NHL starters?
Re: Lack or Condon
Lack 10%
Condon 25%
^My odds
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)
Re: Lack or Condon
starters..no, regular backups with solid GP..yes.
ESPN Roto 10 team
24 man roster (+3 IR) - Keep 20 - Daily settings
Start 3C, 3LW, 3RW, 5D, 2G, 1UTIL
G,A,PTS, +/-, PIM, PPA, PPG, D PTS - W, SV, SV%
C- Zegras, Suzuki, Carlsson
RW- Batherson, Michkov, Quinn, Perfetti(C,LW), Foerster, Kakko
LW- BTkachuk, Stutzle(C), Byfield(C), McTavish(C), Benson
D- Mintyukov, Sanderson, LHughes, Clarke, Faber
G- Wolf, Askarov, Wallstedt
IR- Norris(C)
IR- Fantilli(C)
IR-
Picks in 2024/25 rounds 1,1,1,2
Picks in 2025/26 rounds 1,1,3,4
Re: Lack or Condon
Condon continues to impress. He's the best of the two IMO. Neither will become #1's anywhere from my perspective.
Re: Lack or Condon
No, I don't think either will be 'real' starters. Although they may get starting gigs at some point due to circumstance.
Re: Lack or Condon
Condon did have a sustained gig once, but neither one seems cut from a starter's cloth.
DobberHockey Senior Writer (columnist since 2012)
Click here to read my weekly "Roos Lets Loose" columns, going live every Wednesday morning and consisting of a rotating schedule of a "forum buzz" column, a fantasy hockey mailbag, a tournament/poll, and an edition of Goldipucks and the Three Skaters: https://dobberhockey.com/category/ho...key-rick-roos/
Re: Lack or Condon
I do think Condon can have value, but I think Lack can be better. I believe Smith is overated and will fail and then Lack will become the starter on a good team. Agree?
Re: Lack or Condon
I think Condon could be the Senators #1 Starter next season. This is Andersons last year in his current contract while Condon is startling year one of his three year contract. At this point, who else does Ottawa have to take over?Originally Posted by defenseman 5
Re: Lack or Condon
Oufff, I read "Lack of condom"...
Considering the thread is not about playing with fire, I'll side with the safer pick and that's Condon! The odds are against both but if one could make it, I think it's Condon. I like EB's percentages (25%, 10%)
Keeper league 14 teams (H2H, 20 active players keep 16 NHLers, 16 minors)
Scoring Cats: G-A-PTS-PPG-PPA-(+/-)-HITS-BLK-SHP-SOG-FOW-GWG / W-L-SVS-SV%-GAA-SO
C- Crosby, Barzal, Bennett, Schmaltz, Novak
W- Forsberg, Batherson, Nichuskin, Tuch, Konecny, Maccelli, Sharangovich, Bertuzzi, Kaliyev, Neighbours, Reichel
D- Carlson, Rielly, Klingberg
G- Hellebuyck, Demko, Merzlikins, Vejmelka
Minors:
F: Fantilli, Cooley, Bourgault, Perreault, Cowan, Ohgren, N. Foote, Goyette, Iskhakov, Denisenko, Tracey
D: Simashev, Willander, Lambos
G: Schmidt, Rodrigue, DiPietro, Gaudreau, McKay
Re: Lack or Condon
Condon is trending up and Lack is trending down. If one does it I'd bet on Condon.
Contact me for Frozen Tools bug reports and inquiries
Follow Frozen Tools on Twitter @FrozenTools
Follow me on Twitter @DH_EricDaoust
Posting Permissions
